gory Farnum [mailto:gfar...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: 31 August 2015 13:02
>> To: Yan, Zheng
>> Cc: Simon Hallam; Zheng Yan; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Testing CephFS
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>>>
c: Simon Hallam; Zheng Yan; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Testing CephFS
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Gregory Farnum
> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Simon Hallam
&
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Simon Hallam wrote:
>>> Hi Greg,
>>>
>>> The MDS' detect that the other one went down and started the replay.
>>>
>>> I did some further testing with
om client.24152 10.10.10.67:0/3475305031 after 647.925323
>> (allowed interval 45)
>> 2015-08-24 11:13:51.037681 mds.0 [INF] denied reconnect attempt (mds is
>> up:active) from client.24149 10.10.10.68:0/22416725 after 648.029988
>> (allowed interval 45)
>>
>> I
n Hallam; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Testing CephFS
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Simon Hallam wrote:
> > The clients are:
> > [root@gridnode50 ~]# uname -a
> > Linux gridnode50 4.0.8-200.fc21.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jul 10 21:09:54 UTC
om: Yan, Zheng [mailto:z...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: 24 August 2015 12:28
>> To: Simon Hallam
>> Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com; Gregory Farnum
>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Testing CephFS
>>
>>
>> > On Aug 24, 2015, at 18:38, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>> >
t; Cheers,
>
> Simon
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Yan, Zheng [mailto:z...@redhat.com]
> > Sent: 24 August 2015 12:28
> > To: Simon Hallam
> > Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com; Gregory Farnum
> > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Testing CephFS
> >
80 after 628.105302
> (allowed interval 45)
> >> 2015-08-24 11:13:50.933020 mds.0 [INF] denied reconnect attempt (mds is
> up:active) from client.24152 10.10.10.67:0/3475305031 after 647.925323
> (allowed interval 45)
> >> 2015-08-24 11:13:51.037681 mds.0 [INF] denied reconnect
allowed interval 45)
>> 2015-08-24 11:13:50.933020 mds.0 [INF] denied reconnect attempt (mds is
>> up:active) from client.24152 10.10.10.67:0/3475305031 after 647.925323
>> (allowed interval 45)
>> 2015-08-24 11:13:51.037681 mds.0 [INF] denied reconnect attempt (mds i
mds.0 [INF] denied reconnect attempt (mds is
> up:active) from client.24149 10.10.10.68:0/22416725 after 648.029988 (allowed
> interval 45)
>
> I did just notice that none of the times match up. So may try again once I
> fix ntp/chrony and see if that makes a difference.
>
> Ch
difference.
Cheers,
Simon
> -Original Message-
> From: Gregory Farnum [mailto:gfar...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 21 August 2015 12:16
> To: Simon Hallam
> Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Testing CephFS
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:07 AM,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Simon Hallam wrote:
> Hey all,
>
>
>
> We are currently testing CephFS on a small (3 node) cluster.
>
>
>
> The setup is currently:
>
>
>
> Each server has 12 OSDs, 1 Monitor and 1 MDS running on it:
>
> The servers are running: 0.94.2-0.el7
>
> The clients are r
Hey all,
We are currently testing CephFS on a small (3 node) cluster.
The setup is currently:
Each server has 12 OSDs, 1 Monitor and 1 MDS running on it:
The servers are running: 0.94.2-0.el7
The clients are running: Ceph: 0.80.10-1.fc21, Kernel: 4.0.6-200.fc21.x86_64
ceph -s
cluster 4ed5ec
13 matches
Mail list logo
