> On Friday, May 13, 2016, Mike Jacobacci wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a quick and probably dumb question… We would like to use Ceph
> for our storage, I was thinking of a cluster with 3 Monitor and OSD
> nodes. I was wondering if it was a bad idea to start a Ceph cluster
>>
Hi Christian,
Thank you, I know what I am asking isn't a good idea... I am just trying to
avoid waiting for all three nodes before I began virtualizing our
infrastructure.
Again thanks for the responses!
Cheers,
Mike
> On May 14, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
>
> On Sat, 14 May
On Sat, 14 May 2016 09:46:23 -0700 Mike Jacobacci wrote:
Hello,
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thank you for your response! Yes, this is for a production
> environment... Do you think the risk of data loss due to the single node
> be different than if it was an appliance or a Linux box with raid/zfs?
>
Depends
Hi Alex,
Thank you for your response! Yes, this is for a production environment... Do
you think the risk of data loss due to the single node be different than if it
was an appliance or a Linux box with raid/zfs?
Cheers,
Mike
> On May 13, 2016, at 7:38 PM, Alex Gorbachev wrote:
>
>
>
>> On
On Friday, May 13, 2016, Mike Jacobacci wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a quick and probably dumb question… We would like to use Ceph for
> our storage, I was thinking of a cluster with 3 Monitor and OSD nodes. I
> was wondering if it was a bad idea to start a Ceph cluster with just one
> OSD node (1
Hello,
I have a quick and probably dumb question… We would like to use Ceph for our
storage, I was thinking of a cluster with 3 Monitor and OSD nodes. I was
wondering if it was a bad idea to start a Ceph cluster with just one OSD node
(10 OSDs, 2 SSDs), then add more nodes as our budget allows
