Re: [ceph-users] Replication vs Erasure Coding with only 2 elementsinthe failure-domain.

2017-03-08 Thread Maxime Guyot
tions/erasure-code-lrc/) might help. Cheers, Maxime From: ceph-users on behalf of Burkhard Linke Date: Wednesday 8 March 2017 08:05 To: "ceph-users@lists.ceph.com" Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Replication vs Erasure Coding with only 2 elementsinthe failure-domain. Hi, On 03/07/2017 05:5

Re: [ceph-users] Replication vs Erasure Coding with only 2 elementsinthe failure-domain.

2017-03-07 Thread Burkhard Linke
Hi, On 03/07/2017 05:53 PM, Francois Blondel wrote: Hi all, We have (only) 2 separate "rooms" (crush bucket) and would like to build a cluster being able to handle the complete loss of one room. *snipsnap* Second idea would be to use Erasure Coding, as it fits our performance require