Re: [ceph-users] Release notes for firefly not very clear wrt the tunables

2014-07-07 Thread Sage Weil
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, James Harper wrote: > > > > Hi Sage, > > > > > Thanks for pointing this out. Is this clearer? > > > > Yes. Although it would probably be useful to say that using 'ceph osd > > crush tunables bobtail' will be enough to get rid of the warning and > > will not break compatibili

Re: [ceph-users] Release notes for firefly not very clear wrt the tunables

2014-07-07 Thread James Harper
> > Hi Sage, > > > Thanks for pointing this out. Is this clearer? > > Yes. Although it would probably be useful to say that using 'ceph osd > crush tunables bobtail' will be enough to get rid of the warning and > will not break compatibility too much (3.15 isn't that common, there > is not even

Re: [ceph-users] Release notes for firefly not very clear wrt the tunables

2014-07-07 Thread Sage Weil
Hi Sylvain, Thanks for pointing this out. Is this clearer? * The default CRUSH rules and layouts are now using the 'bobtail' tunables and defaults. Upgaded clusters using the old values will now present with a health WARN state. This can be disabled by adding 'mon warn on legacy crush tu

Re: [ceph-users] Release notes for firefly not very clear wrt the tunables

2014-07-07 Thread Sylvain Munaut
Hi Sage, > Thanks for pointing this out. Is this clearer? Yes. Although it would probably be useful to say that using 'ceph osd crush tunables bobtail' will be enough to get rid of the warning and will not break compatibility too much (3.15 isn't that common, there is not even any longterm relea

[ceph-users] Release notes for firefly not very clear wrt the tunables

2014-07-07 Thread Sylvain Munaut
Hi, In the release notes for firefly, more precisely in the "upgrading from emperor" section, you can find theses two notes : * The default CRUSH rules and layouts are now using the latest and greatest tunables and defaults. Clusters using the old values will now present with a health WARN stat