Re: [ceph-users] Regarding loss of heartbeats

2016-11-29 Thread Nick Fisk
t; >> -Original Message- > >> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf > >> Of Trygve Vea > >> Sent: 29 November 2016 14:07 > >> To: ceph-users > >> Subject: [ceph-users] Regarding loss of heartbeats &

Re: [ceph-users] Regarding loss of heartbeats

2016-11-29 Thread Trygve Vea
- Den 29.nov.2016 15:20 skrev Nick Fisk n...@fisk.me.uk: >> -Original Message- >> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of >> Trygve >> Vea >> Sent: 29 November 2016 14:07 >> To: ceph-users >> Subject:

Re: [ceph-users] Regarding loss of heartbeats

2016-11-29 Thread Nick Fisk
> -Original Message- > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of > Trygve Vea > Sent: 29 November 2016 14:07 > To: ceph-users > Subject: [ceph-users] Regarding loss of heartbeats > > Since Jewel, we've seen quite a bit of f

[ceph-users] Regarding loss of heartbeats

2016-11-29 Thread Trygve Vea
Since Jewel, we've seen quite a bit of funky behaviour in Ceph. I've written about it a few times to the mailing list. Higher CPU utilization after the upgrade / Loss of heartbeats. We've looked at our network setup, and we've optimized some potential bottlenecks some places. Interesting thin