Re: [ceph-users] RGW and Placement Group count

2014-01-07 Thread Wolfgang Hennerbichler
On 08 Jan 2014, at 04:47, Wido den Hollander wrote: >> I expect that basically only one pool (.rgw?) will hold the true data, >> all other stuff (like '.users' and so on) will not be data intensive, as >> it might only store metadata. >> > Indeed. So you can have less PGs for these pools. Only t

Re: [ceph-users] RGW and Placement Group count

2014-01-07 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 01/07/2014 12:23 PM, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote: Hi, when I designed a ceph cluster nobody talked about radosgw, it was RBD only. Now we are thinking about adding radosgw, and I have some concern when it comes to the number of PG's per OSD (which will grow beyond the 50-100 recommended PG's

[ceph-users] RGW and Placement Group count

2014-01-07 Thread Wolfgang Hennerbichler
Hi, when I designed a ceph cluster nobody talked about radosgw, it was RBD only. Now we are thinking about adding radosgw, and I have some concern when it comes to the number of PG's per OSD (which will grow beyond the 50-100 recommended PG's). According to: http://ceph.com/docs/master/rados/opera