Re: [ceph-users] RBD journaling benchmarks

2017-07-13 Thread Jason Dillaman
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Maged Mokhtar wrote: > The case also applies to active/passive iSCSI.. you still have many > initiators/hypervisors writing concurrently to the same rbd image using a > clustered file system (csv/vmfs). Except from that point-of-view, there is only a single RBD c

Re: [ceph-users] RBD journaling benchmarks

2017-07-13 Thread Maged Mokhtar
-- From: "Jason Dillaman" Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 4:45 AM To: "Maged Mokhtar" Cc: "Mohamad Gebai" ; "ceph-users" Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RBD journaling benchmarks > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:41

Re: [ceph-users] RBD journaling benchmarks

2017-07-12 Thread Jason Dillaman
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Maged Mokhtar wrote: > On 2017-07-10 20:06, Mohamad Gebai wrote: > > > On 07/10/2017 01:51 PM, Jason Dillaman wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Maged Mokhtar wrote: > > These are significant differences, to the point where it may not make sense > to use

Re: [ceph-users] RBD journaling benchmarks

2017-07-10 Thread Maged Mokhtar
On 2017-07-10 20:06, Mohamad Gebai wrote: > On 07/10/2017 01:51 PM, Jason Dillaman wrote: On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:39 > PM, Maged Mokhtar wrote: These are significant > differences, to the point where it may not make sense > to use rbd journaling / mirroring unless there is only 1 active clien

Re: [ceph-users] RBD journaling benchmarks

2017-07-10 Thread Mohamad Gebai
On 07/10/2017 01:51 PM, Jason Dillaman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Maged Mokhtar wrote: >> These are significant differences, to the point where it may not make sense >> to use rbd journaling / mirroring unless there is only 1 active client. > I interpreted the results as the same R

Re: [ceph-users] RBD journaling benchmarks

2017-07-10 Thread Jason Dillaman
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Maged Mokhtar wrote: > These are significant differences, to the point where it may not make sense > to use rbd journaling / mirroring unless there is only 1 active client. I interpreted the results as the same RBD image was being concurrently used by two fio jobs

Re: [ceph-users] RBD journaling benchmarks

2017-07-10 Thread Maged Mokhtar
On 2017-07-10 18:14, Mohamad Gebai wrote: > Resending as my first try seems to have disappeared. > > Hi, > > We ran some benchmarks to assess the overhead caused by enabling > client-side RBD journaling in Luminous. The tests consists of: > - Create an image with journaling enabled (--image-fea

[ceph-users] RBD journaling benchmarks

2017-07-10 Thread Mohamad Gebai
Resending as my first try seems to have disappeared. Hi, We ran some benchmarks to assess the overhead caused by enabling client-side RBD journaling in Luminous. The tests consists of: - Create an image with journaling enabled (--image-feature journaling) - Run randread, randwrite and randrw wor