ssage-
From: Chad William Seys [mailto:cws...@physics.wisc.edu]
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 7:58 AM
To: 池信泽
Cc: Somnath Roy; Haomai Wang; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RAM usage only very slowly decreases after cluster
recovery
Thanks! 'ceph tell osd.* heap release'
Thanks Somnath!
I found a bug in the tracker to follow: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12681
Chad.
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2015 12:55:34 AM
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RAM usage only very slowly decreases after cluster
recovery
Yeah, that means tcmalloc probably caching those as I suspected..
There are some discussion going on in that front, but, unfortuna
ysics.wisc.edu]
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 7:58 AM
To: 池信泽
Cc: Somnath Roy; Haomai Wang; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RAM usage only very slowly decreases after cluster
recovery
Thanks! 'ceph tell osd.* heap release' seems to have worked! Guess I'll
spri
Thanks! 'ceph tell osd.* heap release' seems to have worked! Guess I'll
sprinkle it around my maintenance scripts.
Somnath Is there a plan to make jemalloc standard in Ceph in the future?
Thanks!
Chad.
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.cep
s similar to glibcmalloc.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Somnath
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
> Haomai Wang
> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 7:31 PM
> To: Chad William Seys
> Cc: ceph-us
Wang
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 7:31 PM
To: Chad William Seys
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RAM usage only very slowly decreases after cluster
recovery
Yes, we already notice this, and have PR to fix partial of this I think
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5451/fi
Yes, we already notice this, and have PR to fix partial of this I
think https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5451/files
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:59 AM, Chad William Seys
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It appears that OSD daemons only very slowly free RAM after an extended period
> of an unhealthy cluster (sh
Hi all,
It appears that OSD daemons only very slowly free RAM after an extended period
of an unhealthy cluster (shuffling PGs around).
Prior to a power outage (and recovery) around July 25th, the amount of RAM
used was fairly constant, at most 10GB (out of 24GB). You can see in the
attached P
