OSD numbers are 2^32
On 30/10/2013 16:37, Glen Aidukas wrote:> I wanted to know, does the OSD
numbering half to be sequential and what is the highest usable number (2^16 or
2^32)?
>
> The reason is, I would like to use a numbering convention that reflects the
> cluster number (assuming I will
You really should, I believe the osd number is used in computing crush. Bad
things will happen if you don't use sequential numbers.
On Oct 30, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Glen Aidukas wrote:
> I wanted to know, does the OSD numbering half to be sequential and what is
> the highest usable number (2^16
I wanted to know, does the OSD numbering half to be sequential and what is the
highest usable number (2^16 or 2^32)?
The reason is, I would like to use a numbering convention that reflects the
cluster number (assuming I will have more than one down the road; test, dev,
prod), the host and disk
