Thanks to you all! You confirmed everything I thought I knew, but it is
nice to be sure!
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Mike Dawson wrote:
> Travis,
>
> We run a routed ECMP spine-leaf network architecture with Ceph and have no
> issues on the network side whatsoever. Each leaf switch has an
Travis,
We run a routed ECMP spine-leaf network architecture with Ceph and have
no issues on the network side whatsoever. Each leaf switch has an L2
cidr block inside a common L3 supernet.
We do not currently split cluster_network and public_network. If we did,
we'd likely build a separate s
On 05/28/2014 07:01 PM, Travis Rhoden wrote:
Hi folks,
Does anybody know if there are any issues running Ceph with multiple L2
LAN segements? I'm picturing a large multi-rack/multi-row deployment
where you may give each rack (or row) it's own L2 segment, then connect
them all with L3/ECMP in a
On Wed, 28 May 2014, Travis Rhoden wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Does anybody know if there are any issues running Ceph with multiple L2
> LAN segements? I'm picturing a large multi-rack/multi-row deployment
> where you may give each rack (or row) it's own L2 segment, then connect
> them all with L3/
Hi folks,
Does anybody know if there are any issues running Ceph with multiple L2 LAN
segements? I'm picturing a large multi-rack/multi-row deployment where you
may give each rack (or row) it's own L2 segment, then connect them all with
L3/ECMP in a leaf-spine architecture.
I'm wondering how clu
