For very small values of production. I never had more than a couple clients
hitting either of them, but they were doing "real work". Ultimately though,
we decided to just use NFS exports from a VM to do what we were trying to
do with rgw and mds.
QH
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Nate Curry wr
Yes that was what I meant. Thanks. Was that in a production environment?
Nate Curry
On Jul 10, 2015 11:21 AM, "Quentin Hartman"
wrote:
> You mean the hardware config? They are older Core2-based servers with 4GB
> of RAM. Nothing special. I have one running mon and rgw, one running mon
> and md
You mean the hardware config? They are older Core2-based servers with 4GB
of RAM. Nothing special. I have one running mon and rgw, one running mon
and mds, and one run just a mon.
QH
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Nate Curry wrote:
> What was your monitor node's configuration when you had mul
What was your monitor node's configuration when you had multiple ceph
daemons running on them?
*Nate Curry*
IT Manager
ISSM
*Mosaic ATM*
mobile: 240.285.7341
office: 571.223.7036 x226
cu...@mosaicatm.com
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Quentin Hartman <
qhart...@direwolfdigital.com> wrote:
> I h
I have my mons sharing the ceph network, and while I currently do not run
mds or rgw, I have run those on my mon hosts in the past with no
perceptible ill effects.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Nate Curry wrote:
> I have a question in regards to monitor nodes and network layout. Its my
> unde
I have a question in regards to monitor nodes and network layout. Its my
understanding that there should be two networks; a ceph only network for
comms between the various ceph nodes, and a separate storage network where
other systems will interface with the ceph nodes. Are the monitor nodes
supp
