probably fine for a rough impression.
John
>
> Cheers,
>
> Simon
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Gregory Farnum [mailto:gfar...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: 17 December 2015 23:54
>> To: John Spray
>> Cc: Simon Hallam; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> Subje
-Original Message-
> From: Gregory Farnum [mailto:gfar...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 17 December 2015 23:54
> To: John Spray
> Cc: Simon Hallam; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Metadata Server (MDS) Hardware Suggestions
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Joh
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:06 PM, John Spray wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Simon Hallam wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m looking at sizing up some new MDS nodes, but I’m not sure if my thought
>> process is correct or not:
>>
>>
>>
>> CPU: Limited to a maximum 2 cores. The higher the
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Simon Hallam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I’m looking at sizing up some new MDS nodes, but I’m not sure if my thought
> process is correct or not:
>
>
>
> CPU: Limited to a maximum 2 cores. The higher the GHz, the more IOPS
> available. So something like a single E5-2
Hi all,
I'm looking at sizing up some new MDS nodes, but I'm not sure if my thought
process is correct or not:
CPU: Limited to a maximum 2 cores. The higher the GHz, the more IOPS available.
So something like a single E5-2637v3 should fulfil this.
Memory: The more the better, as the metadata ca
