On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Dan Ryder (daryder) wrote:
> Thanks Greg,
>
> That makes sense.
>
> Can you also confirm that latency values are always in seconds?
> I haven't seen any documentation for it and want to be sure before I say it
> is one way or the other.
I believe that's the case,
, May 09, 2014 1:42 PM
To: Dan Ryder (daryder)
Cc: Haomai Wang; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Low latency values
The recovery_state "latencies" are all about how long your PGs are in various
states of recovery; they're not per-operation latencies. 3 days still seem
cy should be anywhere
> near that high. 290700 seconds > 3 days.
>
> 86047405.517876000 / 296 = 290700.694317 seconds?
>
> 53489945.22253 / 240 = 222874.771761 seconds?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Haomai Wang [mailto:haomaiw...@gmail.com]
&
iginal Message-
From: Haomai Wang [mailto:haomaiw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 12:29 PM
To: Dan Ryder (daryder)
Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Low latency values
yes
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Dan Ryder (daryder) wrote:
> Thanks Haomai,
>
>
; To: Dan Ryder (daryder)
> Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Low latency values
>
> 178/184229=0.00097 s = 0.97ms
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Dan Ryder (daryder)
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m seeing really low latency
Thanks Haomai,
So are all latency values calculated in seconds?
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Haomai Wang [mailto:haomaiw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 11:20 AM
To: Dan Ryder (daryder)
Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Low latency values
178/184229=0.00097 s
178/184229=0.00097 s = 0.97ms
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Dan Ryder (daryder) wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’m seeing really low latency values, to the extent that they don’t seem
> realistic.
>
>
>
> Snippet from the latest perf dump for this OSD:
>
>
>
> "op_r_latency": { "avgcount": 184229,
>
>
Hi,
I'm seeing really low latency values, to the extent that they don't seem
realistic.
Snippet from the latest perf dump for this OSD:
"op_r_latency": { "avgcount": 184229,
"sum": 178.07771},
Long run avg = 178.07771/184229 = 0.00097 ms? Is it correct that latency values
have m
