Hello all,
I work in the same team as Tyler here, and I can provide more info here..
The cluster is indeed an RGW cluster, with many small (100 KB) objects
similar to your use case Bryan. But we have the blind bucket set up with
"index_type": 1 for this particular bucket, as we wanted to avoid
To: Dan van der Ster
> Cc: "ceph-users@lists.ceph.com"
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Living with huge bucket sizes
> Message-ID:
> gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 2:21 AM, Dan van der Ster
> wr
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 2:21 AM, Dan van der Ster wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
>
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Bryan Stillwell
> wrote:
>> This has come up quite a few times before, but since I was only working with
>> RBD before I didn't pay too close attention to the conversation. I'm
>> looking
>>
Hi Bryan,
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Bryan Stillwell wrote:
> This has come up quite a few times before, but since I was only working with
> RBD before I didn't pay too close attention to the conversation. I'm
> looking
> for the best way to handle existing clusters that have buckets with a
This has come up quite a few times before, but since I was only working with
RBD before I didn't pay too close attention to the conversation. I'm looking
for the best way to handle existing clusters that have buckets with a large
number of objects (>20 million) in them. The cluster I'm doing test
