Re: [ceph-users] Latency for the Public Network

2018-02-06 Thread Christian Balzer
Hello, On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:21:22 +0100 Tobias Kropf wrote: > On 02/06/2018 04:03 AM, Christian Balzer wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 22:04:00 +0100 Tobias Kropf wrote: > > > >> Hi ceph list, > >> > >> we have a hyperconvergent ceph cluster with kvm on 8 nodes with ceph > >> ham

Re: [ceph-users] Latency for the Public Network

2018-02-06 Thread Tobias Kropf
On 02/06/2018 04:03 AM, Christian Balzer wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 22:04:00 +0100 Tobias Kropf wrote: > >> Hi ceph list, >> >> we have a hyperconvergent ceph cluster with kvm on 8 nodes with ceph >> hammer 0.94.10. > Do I smell Proxmox? Yes we use atm Proxmox > >> The cluster is now

Re: [ceph-users] Latency for the Public Network

2018-02-05 Thread Christian Balzer
Hello, On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 22:04:00 +0100 Tobias Kropf wrote: > Hi ceph list, > > we have a hyperconvergent ceph cluster with kvm on 8 nodes with ceph > hammer 0.94.10. Do I smell Proxmox? > The cluster is now 3 years old an we plan with a new > cluster for a high iops project. We use replicat

[ceph-users] Latency for the Public Network

2018-02-05 Thread Tobias Kropf
Hi ceph list, we have a hyperconvergent ceph cluster with kvm on 8 nodes with ceph hammer 0.94.10. The cluster is now 3 years old an we plan with a new cluster for a high iops project. We use replicated pools 3/2 and have not the best latency on our switch backend. ping -s 8192 10.10.10.40 8200