Re: [ceph-users] Installing firefly v0.80.9 on RHEL 6.5

2015-04-07 Thread Bruce McFarland
nly get packages from the distribution and not from the ceph.com > repositories. > > Cheers > >> Bruce >> >> >> -----Original Message- >> From: Loic Dachary [mailto:l...@dachary.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 1:32 AM >> To: B

Re: [ceph-users] Installing firefly v0.80.9 on RHEL 6.5

2015-04-07 Thread Loic Dachary
gt;> name=Ceph noarch packages >> gpgkey=https://ceph.com/git/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.as >> c >> enabled=1 >> baseurl=http://ceph.com/rpm-firefly/el6/noarch >> priority=1 >> gpgcheck=1 >> type=rpm-md >> >> [root@essperf13

Re: [ceph-users] Installing firefly v0.80.9 on RHEL 6.5

2015-04-07 Thread Bruce McFarland
cFarland; ceph-users Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Installing firefly v0.80.9 on RHEL 6.5 Hi Bruce, On 07/04/2015 02:40, Bruce McFarland wrote: > I'm not sure exactly what your steps where, but I reinstalled a monitor > yesterday on Centos 6.5 using ceph-deploy with the /etc/yum.repos.d/ceph.r

Re: [ceph-users] Installing firefly v0.80.9 on RHEL 6.5

2015-04-07 Thread Loic Dachary
: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of Loic > Dachary > Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 5:33 PM > To: ceph-users > Subject: [ceph-users] Installing firefly v0.80.9 on RHEL 6.5 > > Hi, > > I tried to install firefly v0.80.9 on a freshly installed RHEL

Re: [ceph-users] Installing firefly v0.80.9 on RHEL 6.5

2015-04-06 Thread Bruce McFarland
f Loic Dachary Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 5:33 PM To: ceph-users Subject: [ceph-users] Installing firefly v0.80.9 on RHEL 6.5 Hi, I tried to install firefly v0.80.9 on a freshly installed RHEL 6.5 by following http://ceph.com/docs/master/start/quick-ceph-deploy/#create-a-cluster but it in

[ceph-users] Installing firefly v0.80.9 on RHEL 6.5

2015-04-06 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi, I tried to install firefly v0.80.9 on a freshly installed RHEL 6.5 by following http://ceph.com/docs/master/start/quick-ceph-deploy/#create-a-cluster but it installed v0.80.5 instead. Is it really what we want by default ? Or is it me misreading the instructions somehow ? Cheers -- Loïc D