On 04.06.2013 20:03, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
> Any experiences with clustered FS on top of RBD devices?
> Which FS do you suggest for more or less 10.000 mailboxes accessed by 10
> dovecot nodes ?
There is an ongoing effort to implement librados storage in Dovecot,
AFAIK. Maybe it's worth loo
Hi Gandalf,
Am 04.06.2013 21:45, schrieb Gandalf Corvotempesta:
> 2013/6/4 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
> mailto:f.wiess...@smart-weblications.de>>
>
> we use ocfs2 ontop of rbd... the only bad thing is that ocfs2 will fence
> all
> nodes if rbd is not responding within def
2013/6/4 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner <
f.wiess...@smart-weblications.de>
> we use ocfs2 ontop of rbd... the only bad thing is that ocfs2 will fence
> all
> nodes if rbd is not responding within defined timeout...
if rbd is not responding to all nodes, having all ocfs2 fenced shoul
Am 04.06.2013 20:03, schrieb Gandalf Corvotempesta:
> Any experiences with clustered FS on top of RBD devices?
> Which FS do you suggest for more or less 10.000 mailboxes accessed by 10
> dovecot
> nodes ?
>
we use ocfs2 ontop of rbd... the only bad thing is that ocfs2 will fence all
nodes if rb
Any experiences with clustered FS on top of RBD devices?
Which FS do you suggest for more or less 10.000 mailboxes accessed by 10
dovecot nodes ?
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
