Re: [ceph-users] CephFS - Problems with the reported used space

2015-08-07 Thread Yan, Zheng
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Goncalo Borges wrote: > Hi All... > > I am still fighting with this issue. It may be something which is not > properly implemented, and if that is the case, that is fine. > > I am still trying to understand what is the real space occupied by files in > a /cephfs fil

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS - Problems with the reported used space

2015-08-07 Thread Goncalo Borges
Hi All... I am still fighting with this issue. It may be something which is not properly implemented, and if that is the case, that is fine. I am still trying to understand what is the real space occupied by files in a /cephfs filesystem, reported for example by a df. Maybe I did not expla

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS - Problems with the reported used space

2015-08-04 Thread Yan, Zheng
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Goncalo Borges wrote: > Hi Yan Zheng > > >> >> >> >> Now my questions: >> >> 1) I performed all of this testing to understand what would be the minimum >> size (reported by df) of a file of 1 char and I am still not able to find >> a >> clear answer. In a regular p

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS - Problems with the reported used space

2015-08-03 Thread Goncalo Borges
Hi Yan Zheng Now my questions: 1) I performed all of this testing to understand what would be the minimum size (reported by df) of a file of 1 char and I am still not able to find a clear answer. In a regular posix file system, the size of a 1 char (1 byte) file is actually constrained by t

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS - Problems with the reported used space

2015-08-03 Thread Yan, Zheng
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Goncalo Borges wrote: > Hey John... > > First of all. thank you for the nice talks you have been giving around. > > See the feedback on your suggestions bellow, plus some additional questions. > >> However, please note that in my example I am not doing only deletion

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS - Problems with the reported used space

2015-08-03 Thread Goncalo Borges
Hey John... First of all. thank you for the nice talks you have been giving around. See the feedback on your suggestions bellow, plus some additional questions. However, please note that in my example I am not doing only deletions but also creating and updating files, which afaiu,

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS - Problems with the reported used space

2015-08-03 Thread John Spray
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Goncalo Borges wrote: > Dear CephFS gurus... > > I forgot to mention in my previous email that I do understand the > deletions may take a while to perform since they are completed in the > background by MDS. > The delay in deletions should be unrelated, as althoug

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS - Problems with the reported used space

2015-08-02 Thread Goncalo Borges
Dear CephFS gurus... I forgot to mention in my previous email that I do understand the deletions may take a while to perform since they are completed in the background by MDS. However, please note that in my example I am not doing only deletions but also creating and updating files, which af

[ceph-users] CephFS - Problems with the reported used space

2015-08-02 Thread Goncalo Borges
Dear CephFS gurus... I am testing CephFS and, up to now, I am pretty happy how it is performing. Thank you for this nice piece of software. However, I do have a couple of doubts. Just for reference: - The OS / kernel version I am using in my client is: # cat /etc/redhat-release

Re: [ceph-users] CephFS problems

2014-04-03 Thread Yan, Zheng
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Danny Luhde-Thompson wrote: > Hi, > > Our first attempt at using CephFS in earnest in December ran into a known > bug with the kclients hanging in ceph_mdsc_do_request, which I suspected was > down to the bug in > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ce

[ceph-users] CephFS problems

2014-04-03 Thread Danny Luhde-Thompson
Hi, Our first attempt at using CephFS in earnest in December ran into a known bug with the kclients hanging in ceph_mdsc_do_request, which I suspected was down to the bug in http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ceph.devel/15838. We were on a default Ubuntu 12.04 3.2 kernel, so recent