On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Burkhard Linke
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 08/24/2016 10:22 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Burkhard Linke
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the Firefly and Hammer releases did not support transparent usage of
>>> cache
>>> tiering in CephF
Hi,
On 08/24/2016 10:22 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Burkhard Linke
wrote:
Hi,
the Firefly and Hammer releases did not support transparent usage of cache
tiering in CephFS. The cache tier itself had to be specified as data pool,
thus preventing on-the-fly additi
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Burkhard Linke
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the Firefly and Hammer releases did not support transparent usage of cache
> tiering in CephFS. The cache tier itself had to be specified as data pool,
> thus preventing on-the-fly addition and removal of cache tiers.
>
> Does the sa
Hi,
the Firefly and Hammer releases did not support transparent usage of
cache tiering in CephFS. The cache tier itself had to be specified as
data pool, thus preventing on-the-fly addition and removal of cache tiers.
Does the same restriction also apply to Jewel? I would like to add a
cache
