Re: [ceph-users] Ceph v0.79 Firefly RC :: erasure-code-profile command set not present

2014-04-10 Thread Karan Singh
Finally everything worked with ceph version 0.79-125 . I agree with you , version 0.79 does have erasure-code-profile command set , But This mess was due to ceph init script which was missing "/lib/lsb/init-functions” file which is blocking ceph services to get started. Thanks Sage / Alfredo fo

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph v0.79 Firefly RC :: erasure-code-profile command set not present

2014-04-09 Thread Alfredo Deza
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Hi Karan, > > Just to double check - run the same command after ssh'ing into each of the > osd hosts, and maybe again on the monitor hosts too (just in case you have > *some* hosts successfully updated to 0.79 and some still on < 0.78). Just

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph v0.79 Firefly RC :: erasure-code-profile command set not present

2014-04-09 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Hi Karan, Just to double check - run the same command after ssh'ing into each of the osd hosts, and maybe again on the monitor hosts too (just in case you have *some* hosts successfully updated to 0.79 and some still on < 0.78). Regards Mark On 08/04/14 22:32, Karan Singh wrote: Hi Loic

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph v0.79 Firefly RC :: erasure-code-profile command set not present

2014-04-08 Thread Sage Weil
On Tue, 8 Apr 2014, Karan Singh wrote: > Thanks Developers for 0.79 , happy to see its announcement. > I have been using 0.78 in order to test EC and TP , with 0.78 i was not able > to test erasure code profile feature  ( # ceph osd erasure-code-profile > set myprofile ??) as erasure-code-profile c

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph v0.79 Firefly RC :: erasure-code-profile command set not present

2014-04-08 Thread Karan Singh
Hi Loic Here is the output # ceph --version ceph version 0.79 (4c2d73a5095f527c3a2168deb5fa54b3c8991a6e) # # ceph osd erasure-code-profile no valid command found; 10 closest matches: osd tier add-cache osd tier set-overlay osd tier remove-overlay osd tier remove osd tier cache-mode none

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph v0.79 Firefly RC :: erasure-code-profile command set not present

2014-04-08 Thread Mark Kirkwood
I'm not sure if this is relevant, but my 0.78 (and currently building 0.79) are compiled from src git checkout (and packages built from the same src tree using dpkg-buildpackage Debian/Ubuntu package builder). Having said that - the above procedure *should* produce equivalent binaries to the o

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph v0.79 Firefly RC :: erasure-code-profile command set not present

2014-04-08 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi Karan, What is the output of ceph --version ? Cheers On 08/04/2014 11:44, Karan Singh wrote: > Thanks Mark for this quick checkup on Ubuntu distro. you saved my time , i > was also checking the same thing. > > All of my ceph components are on 0.79 , this looks to be a problem with ceph >

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph v0.79 Firefly RC :: erasure-code-profile command set not present

2014-04-08 Thread Karan Singh
Thanks Mark for this quick checkup on Ubuntu distro. you saved my time , i was also checking the same thing. All of my ceph components are on 0.79 , this looks to be a problem with ceph binaries for RHEL. @ Ceph Developers : Any thought on this. # rpm -qa | egrep -i "ceph|rados|rbd" ceph-depl

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph v0.79 Firefly RC :: erasure-code-profile command set not present

2014-04-08 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Wow - that is a bit strange: $ cat /etc/issue Ubuntu 13.10 \n \l $ sudo ceph -v ceph version 0.78-569-g6a4c50d (6a4c50d7f27d2e7632d8c017d09e864e969a05f7) $ sudo ceph osd erasure-code-profile ls default myprofile profile profile1 I'd hazard a guess that some of your ceph components are at versi

[ceph-users] Ceph v0.79 Firefly RC :: erasure-code-profile command set not present

2014-04-08 Thread Karan Singh
Thanks Developers for 0.79 , happy to see its announcement. I have been using 0.78 in order to test EC and TP , with 0.78 i was not able to test erasure code profile feature ( # ceph osd erasure-code-profile set myprofile ……) as erasure-code-profile command set is not present in 0.78 but its m