Re: [ceph-users] Ceph killed by OS because of OOM under high load

2013-06-04 Thread Yan, Zheng
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Chen, Xiaoxi wrote: > Hi Greg, > Yes, Thanks for your advice ,we do turn down the > osd_client_message_size_cap to 100MB/OSD ,both Journal queue and filestore > queue are set to 100MB also. > That's 300MB/OSD in total, but from TOP we see: >

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph killed by OS because of OOM under high load

2013-06-03 Thread Chen, Xiaoxi
iaoxi -Original Message- From: Gregory Farnum [mailto:g...@inktank.com] Sent: 2013年6月4日 0:37 To: Chen, Xiaoxi Cc: ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org; Mark Nelson (mark.nel...@inktank.com); ceph-us...@ceph.com Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ceph killed by OS because of OOM under high load On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph killed by OS because of OOM under high load

2013-06-03 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Chen, Xiaoxi wrote: > Hi, > As my previous mail reported some weeks ago ,we are suffering from > OSD crash/ OSD Flipping / System reboot and etc, all these unstable issue > really stop us from digging further into ceph characterization. > Good news

[ceph-users] Ceph killed by OS because of OOM under high load

2013-06-03 Thread Chen, Xiaoxi
Hi, As my previous mail reported some weeks ago ,we are suffering from OSD crash/ OSD Flipping / System reboot and etc, all these unstable issue really stop us from digging further into ceph characterization. Good news is that we seems find out the cause, I explain our experiment