On 04/29/2016 11:44 AM, Ming Lin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
>> Everyone is right - sort of :)
>>
>> It is that target_core_rbd module that I made that was rejected
>> upstream, along with modifications from SUSE which added persistent
>> reservations support. I
.@redhat.com
> <mailto:mchri...@redhat.com>]
> >> Sent: 19 January 2016 21:34
> >> To: Василий Ангапов <mailto:anga...@gmail.com>>; Ilya Dryomov
> >> mailto:idryo...@gmail.com>>
> >> Cc: Nick Fis
"Status:
This code is now being ported to the upstream linux kernel reservation API
added in this commit:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/block/ioctl.c?id=bbd3e064362e5057cc4799ba2e4d68c7593e490b
When this is completed, LIO will call into the iblock backend
om] On Behalf Of
> Mike Christie
> Sent: 21 January 2016 03:12
> To: Nick Fisk ; 'Василий Ангапов' ;
> 'Ilya Dryomov'
> Cc: 'Dominik Zalewski' ; 'ceph-users' us...@lists.ceph.com>
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CentOS 7 iscsi gateway usin
Mike Christie [mailto:mchri...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: 19 January 2016 21:34
>> To: Василий Ангапов ; Ilya Dryomov
>>
>> Cc: Nick Fisk ; Tyler Bishop
>> ; Dominik Zalewski
>> ; ceph-users
>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CentOS 7 iscsi gateway using lrbd
>
t; ; Dominik Zalewski
> ; ceph-users
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] CentOS 7 iscsi gateway using lrbd
>
> Everyone is right - sort of :)
>
> It is that target_core_rbd module that I made that was rejected upstream,
> along with modifications from SUSE which added persisten
Everyone is right - sort of :)
It is that target_core_rbd module that I made that was rejected
upstream, along with modifications from SUSE which added persistent
reservations support. I also made some modifications to rbd so
target_core_rbd and krbd could share code. target_core_rbd uses rbd like
So is it a different approach that was used here by Mike Christie:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg10330.html ?
It seems to be a confusion because it also implements target_core_rbd
module. Or not?
2016-01-19 18:01 GMT+08:00 Ilya Dryomov :
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Nick Fisk
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Nick Fisk wrote:
> But interestingly enough, if you look down to where they run the targetcli
> ls, it shows a RBD backing store.
>
> Maybe it's using the krbd driver to actually do the Ceph side of the
> communication, but lio plugs into this rather than just t
fferent?
> >
> >
> >
> > From: "Dominik Zalewski"
> > To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> > Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 6:35:20 AM
> > Subject: [ceph-users] CentOS 7 iscsi gateway using lrbd
> >
> > Hi,
ph.com
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 6:35:20 AM
> Subject: [ceph-users] CentOS 7 iscsi gateway using lrbd
>
> Hi,
> I'm looking into implementing iscsi gateway with MPIO using lrbd -
> https://github.com/swiftgist/lrb
>
>
> https://www.suse.com/docrep/documents/kgu61
Subject: [ceph-users] CentOS 7 iscsi gateway using lrbd
Hi,
I'm looking into implementing iscsi gateway with MPIO using lrbd -
https://github.com/swiftgist/lrb
https://www.suse.com/docrep/documents/kgu61iyowz/suse_enterprise_storage_2_and_iscsi.pdf
https://www.susecon.com/doc/2015/sess
Hi,
I'm looking into implementing iscsi gateway with MPIO using lrbd -
https://github.com/swiftgist/lrb
https://www.suse.com/docrep/documents/kgu61iyowz/suse_enterprise_storage_2_and_iscsi.pdf
https://www.susecon.com/doc/2015/sessions/TUT16512.pdf
>From above examples:
*For iSCSI failover and
13 matches
Mail list logo
