Re: [ceph-users] CEPH cache layer. Very slow

2015-08-14 Thread Voloshanenko Igor
> > > Megov Igor > > CIO, Yuterra > > > > ________ > > От: ceph-users > от > имени Voloshanenko > > Igor > > > Отправлено: 13 августа 2015 г. 15:54 > > Кому: Jan Schermer > > Копия: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com

Re: [ceph-users] CEPH cache layer. Very slow

2015-08-13 Thread Voloshanenko Igor
So, good, but price for 845 DC PRO 400 GB higher in about 2x times than intel S3500 240G ((( Any other models? ((( 2015-08-13 15:45 GMT+03:00 Jan Schermer : > I tested and can recommend the Samsung 845 DC PRO (make sure it is DC PRO > and not just "PRO" or "DC EVO"!). > Those were very cheap but

Re: [ceph-users] CEPH cache layer. Very slow

2015-08-13 Thread Jan Schermer
I tested and can recommend the Samsung 845 DC PRO (make sure it is DC PRO and not just "PRO" or "DC EVO"!). Those were very cheap but are out of stock at the moment (here). Faster than Intels, cheaper, and slightly different technology (3D V-NAND) which IMO makes them superior without needing man

Re: [ceph-users] CEPH cache layer. Very slow

2015-08-13 Thread Voloshanenko Igor
Tnx, Irek! Will try! but another question to all, which SSD good enough for CEPH now? I'm looking into S3500 240G (I have some S3500 120G which show great results. Around 8x times better than Samsung) Possible you can give advice about other vendors/models with same or below price level as S3500

Re: [ceph-users] CEPH cache layer. Very slow

2015-08-13 Thread Irek Fasikhov
Hi, Igor. Try to roll the patch here: http://www.theirek.com/blog/2014/02/16/patch-dlia-raboty-s-enierghoniezavisimym-keshiem-ssd-diskov P.S. I am no longer tracks changes in this direction(kernel), because we use already recommended SSD С уважением, Фасихов Ирек Нургаязович Моб.: +79229045757 2

Re: [ceph-users] CEPH cache layer. Very slow

2015-08-13 Thread Voloshanenko Igor
So, after testing SSD (i wipe 1 SSD, and used it for tests) root@ix-s2:~# sudo fio --filename=/dev/sda --direct=1 --sync=1 --rw=write --bs=4k --numjobs=1 --iodepth=1 --runtime=60 --time_based --gr[53/1800] ting --name=journal-test journal-test: (g=0): rw=write, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=sync,

Re: [ceph-users] CEPH cache layer. Very slow

2015-08-12 Thread Pieter Koorts
Hi Igor I suspect you have very much the same problem as me. https://www.mail-archive.com/ceph-users@lists.ceph.com/msg22260.html Basically Samsung drives (like many SATA SSD's) are very much hit and miss so you will need to test them like described here to see if they are any good.  http://ww

[ceph-users] CEPH cache layer. Very slow

2015-08-12 Thread Voloshanenko Igor
Hi all, we have setup CEPH cluster with 60 OSD (2 diff types) (5 nodes, 12 disks on each, 10 HDD, 2 SSD) Also we cover this with custom crushmap with 2 root leaf ID WEIGHT TYPE NAME UP/DOWN REWEIGHT PRIMARY-AFFINITY -100 5.0 root ssd -102 1.0 host ix-s2-ssd 2 1.