Am 26.06.2014 02:08, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
> It's a good idea, and in fact there was a discussion yesterday during
> the Ceph Developer Summit about making scrub repair significantly more
> powerful; they're keeping that use case in mind in addition to very
> fine-grained ones like specifying a p
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Christian Kauhaus wrote:
> Am 23.06.2014 20:24, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
>> Well, actually it always takes the primary copy, unless the primary
>> has some way of locally telling that its version is corrupt. (This
>> might happen if the primary thinks it should hav
Am 23.06.2014 20:24, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
> Well, actually it always takes the primary copy, unless the primary
> has some way of locally telling that its version is corrupt. (This
> might happen if the primary thinks it should have an object, but it
> doesn't exist on disk.) But there's not a v
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Christian Eichelmann
wrote:
> Hi ceph users,
>
> since our cluster had a few inconsistent pgs in the last time, i was
> wondering what ceph pg repair does, depending on the replication level.
> So I just wanted to check if my assumptions are correct:
>
> Replicatio
Hi ceph users,
since our cluster had a few inconsistent pgs in the last time, i was
wondering what ceph pg repair does, depending on the replication level.
So I just wanted to check if my assumptions are correct:
Replication 2x
Since the cluster can not decide which version is correct one, it wou
