On 2019-07-17T11:56:25, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> So, I see the recommendation for 4% of OSD space for blocks.db/WAL and the
> corresponding discussion regrading the 3/30/300GB vs 6/60/600GB allocation.
>
> How does this change when WAL is seperate from blocks.db?
>
> Reading [0] it seems that 6/
So, I see the recommendation for 4% of OSD space for blocks.db/WAL and the
corresponding discussion regrading the 3/30/300GB vs 6/60/600GB allocation.
How does this change when WAL is seperate from blocks.db?
Reading [0] it seems that 6/60/600 is not correct. It seems that to compact
a 300GB DB,
