2014-02-19 9:40 GMT+01:00 Schlacta, Christ :
> In just the last week I've seen at least two failures as a result of
> replication factor two. I would highly suggest that for any critical data
> you choose an rf of at least three.
>
Could you explain me why failures happened?
> With your stated ca
2014-02-19 9:31 GMT+01:00 Robert Sander :
>
> Drop RAID5 and create one OSD per harddisk.
>
I was thinking about using RAID5 to keep the disk redundancy even during
the file sync process through the nodes.
What do you think about this?
> If you need to store small files consider how your applica
In just the last week I've seen at least two failures as a result of
replication factor two. I would highly suggest that for any critical data
you choose an rf of at least three.
With your stated capacity, you're looking at a mere 16TB with rf3. You'll
need to look into slightly more capacity or w
On 18.02.2014 21:41, shacky wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have to create a new Ceph cluster with 3 nodes with 4 hard drives in
> RAID5 (12Tb available per node).
Drop RAID5 and create one OSD per harddisk.
If you need to store small files consider how your applications
communicates with the storage cluster
Hi.
I have to create a new Ceph cluster with 3 nodes with 4 hard drives in
RAID5 (12Tb available per node).
I will need 18Tb of available space, so I will create two OSDs per node
with a replication factor of 2, and my data will be safe if a node will
fail, right?
Can you advise me a good configu
