But is there any way to recreate bucket index for existing bucket? Is
it possible to change bucket's index pool to some new pool in its
metadata and them tell RadosGW to rebuild (--check --fix) index?
Sounds really crazy but will it work? Will the new index become
sharded?
2016-06-14 13:18 GMT+03:
Hi,
your cluster will be in warning state if you disable scrubbing, and
you relay need it in case of some data loss
cheers,
Ansgar
2016-06-14 11:05 GMT+02:00 Wido den Hollander :
>
>> Op 14 juni 2016 om 11:00 schreef Василий Ангапов :
>>
>>
>> Is it a good idea to disable scrub and deep-scrub fo
Hi,
yes we have index sharding enabled, we have only tow big buckets at
the moment with 15Mil objects each and some smaller ones
cheers,
Ansgar
2016-06-14 10:51 GMT+02:00 Wido den Hollander :
>
>> Op 14 juni 2016 om 10:10 schreef Ansgar Jazdzewski
>> :
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we are using ceph and r
Hello,
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:20:44 +0300 Nmz wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Wido den Hollander
> To: Василий Ангапов
> Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2016, 12:05:51 PM
> Subject: [ceph-users] 40Mil objects in S3 rados pool / how calculate PGs
>
&g
- Original Message -
From: Wido den Hollander
To: Василий Ангапов
Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2016, 12:05:51 PM
Subject: [ceph-users] 40Mil objects in S3 rados pool / how calculate PGs
>> Op 14 juni 2016 om 11:00 schreef Василий Ангапов :
>>
>>
>> Is it a go
Wido, can you please give more details about that? What sort of
corruption may occur? What scrubbing actually does especially for
bucket index pool?
2016-06-14 12:05 GMT+03:00 Wido den Hollander :
>
>> Op 14 juni 2016 om 11:00 schreef Василий Ангапов :
>>
>>
>> Is it a good idea to disable scrub a
> Op 14 juni 2016 om 11:00 schreef Василий Ангапов :
>
>
> Is it a good idea to disable scrub and deep-scrub for bucket.index
> pool? What negative consequences it may cause?
>
No, I would not do that. Scrubbing is essential to detect (silent) data
corruption.
You should really scrub all you
Is it a good idea to disable scrub and deep-scrub for bucket.index
pool? What negative consequences it may cause?
2016-06-14 11:51 GMT+03:00 Wido den Hollander :
>
>> Op 14 juni 2016 om 10:10 schreef Ansgar Jazdzewski
>> :
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we are using ceph and radosGW to store images (~300kb e
> Op 14 juni 2016 om 10:10 schreef Ansgar Jazdzewski
> :
>
>
> Hi,
>
> we are using ceph and radosGW to store images (~300kb each) in S3,
> when in comes to deep-scrubbing we facing task timeouts (> 30s ...)
>
> my questions is:
>
> in case of that amount of objects/files is it better to cal
Hi,
we are using ceph and radosGW to store images (~300kb each) in S3,
when in comes to deep-scrubbing we facing task timeouts (> 30s ...)
my questions is:
in case of that amount of objects/files is it better to calculate the
PGs on a object-bases instant of the volume size? and how it should be
10 matches
Mail list logo
