Hi,
yes, the «step chooseleaf firstn 0 type room» is correct. My problem was
that «crushtool --test» was reporting «bad mapping» PG, and some tests
on an *empty* pool gave me stucked PG in «active+remapped».
After some tests and reading, I saw that :
« For large clusters, some small percentages o
Hi Oliver,
can you post here on the mailing list the steps taken?
>From the IRC logs you said "if I use "choose osd", it works -- but
"chooseleaf ... host" doesn't work"
So, to have data balanced between 2 rooms, is the rule "step chooseleaf
firstn 0 type room" correct?
Thanks
--
Marco
20
Le mercredi 06 mars 2013 à 09:39 +0100, Olivier Bonvalet a écrit :
>
> Le lundi 04 mars 2013 à 09:02 -0800, Gregory Farnum a écrit :
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Olivier Bonvalet
> > wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have a running cluster, which use the (previous) default CRUSH rule,
>
