I think if you haven't defined it in the Ceph config, it's disabled?
Matt
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Rudenko Aleksandr wrote:
> Hi, Sean.
>
> Thank you for the reply.
>
> What does it mean: “We had to disable "rgw dns name" in the end”?
>
> "rgw_dns_name": “”, has no effect for me.
>
>
>
>
Hi, Sean.
Thank you for the reply.
What does it mean: “We had to disable "rgw dns name" in the end”?
"rgw_dns_name": “”, has no effect for me.
On 29 Mar 2018, at 11:23, Sean Purdy
mailto:s.pu...@cv-library.co.uk>> wrote:
We had something similar recently. We had to disable "rgw dns name" i
We had something similar recently. We had to disable "rgw dns name" in the end.
Sean
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, Rudenko Aleksandr said:
>
> Hi friends.
>
>
> I'm sorry, maybe it isn't bug, but i don't know how to solve this problem.
>
> I know that absolute URIs are supported in civetweb and it w
Hi friends.
I'm sorry, maybe it isn't bug, but i don't know how to solve this problem.
I know that absolute URIs are supported in civetweb and it works fine for me
without haproxy in the middle.
But if client send absolute URIs through reverse proxy(haproxy) to civetweb,
civetweb breaks conn