xfs
> On Aug 31, 2016, at 12:14 PM, Lazuardi Nasution
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your opinion. I don't know if RBD-NBD is supported by OpenStack
> since my environment is OpenStack. What file system do you use in your test
> for RBD and RBD-NBD?
>
> Best regards,
>
> On Wed, Aug 31,
Hi,
Thank you for your opinion. I don't know if RBD-NBD is supported by
OpenStack since my environment is OpenStack. What file system do you use in
your test for RBD and RBD-NBD?
Best regards,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:11 PM, RDS wrote:
> In my testing, using RBD-NBD is faster than using RBD
In my testing, using RBD-NBD is faster than using RBD or CephFS.
For a MySQL/sysbench test using 25 threads using OLTP, using a 40G network
between the client and Ceph, here are some of my results:
Using ceph-rbd: transactions per sec: 8620
using ceph rbd-nbd: transaction per sec: 9359
using c
Hi,
I'm looking for pros and cons of mounting /var/lib/mysql with CephFS or RBD
for getting best performance. MySQL save data as files on mostly
configuration but the I/O is block access because the file is opened until
MySQL down. This case give us both options for storing the data files. For
RBD
