rearrange the disks again.
Jan Hugo
On 11/01/2016 12:15 AM, Henrik Korkuc wrote:
> How are your OSDs setup? It is possible that udev rules didn't
> activate your OSDs if it didn't match rules. Refer to
> /lib/udev/rules.d/95-ceph-osd.rules. Basically your partition types
his is normal. You should expect that your disks may get reordered
> after reboot. I am not sure about your setup details, but in 10.2.3
> udev should be able to activate your OSDs no matter the naming (there
> were some bugs in previous 10.2.x releases)
>
> On 16-10-31 18:32, ja
;t know if this is possible.
Could anyone tell me if I can prevent this issue in the future?
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Best regards,
Jan Hugo Prins
Infra and Isilon storage consultant
Better.be B.V.
Auke Vleerstraat 140 E | 7547 AN Enschede | KvK 08097527
T +31 (0) 53 48 00 694 | M +31 (0)6
t shows
very well what a production use would look like.
A lot of reads and writes, a lot of files, all sizes etc. When this
showed to be really very slow I put it aside for a while and then got
the idea to test Ganesha.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Best regards,
Jan Hugo Prins
Infra and Isilon s
ve you used Ganesha with Ceph? How does performance compare
> with kernel nfs?
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 3:30 PM, jan hugo prins <mailto:jpr...@betterbe.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> One of the use-cases I'm currently testing is the possibility to
> replace
Hi Sean,
Thanks for the advice. I'm currently looking at it. First results are
promising.
Jan Hugo
On 09/07/2016 04:48 PM, Sean Redmond wrote:
> Have you seen this :
>
> https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/wiki/Fsalsupport#CEPH
>
>
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Bes
filesystem and that I can spread the client load?
Jan Hugo
On 09/07/2016 04:30 PM, jan hugo prins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the use-cases I'm currently testing is the possibility to replace
> a NFS storage cluster using a Ceph cluster.
>
> The idea I have is to use a server as
the way to go, or are there better
ways to fix this?
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Best regards,
Jan Hugo Prins
Infra and Isilon storage consultant
Better.be B.V.
Auke Vleerstraat 140 E | 7547 AN Enschede | KvK 08097527
T +31 (0) 53 48 00 694 | M +31 (0)6 26 358 951
jpr...@betterbe.com | www.be
Could this have something to do with: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17076
Jan Hugo Prins
On 08/25/2016 10:34 AM, Henrik Korkuc wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I stumbled on the problem that RGW upload results in
> SignatureDoesNotMatch error when I try uploading file with '@' o
.
> The first part of the sync was very fast but after some time it became a
> lot slower.
>
> What I basically see is this for every file:
>
> The file gets transferred.
> The S3 gateway returns a 200 for the transfer
> s3cmd seems to think that something failed (probably the
gards,
Jan Hugo Prins
Infra and Isilon storage consultant
Better.be B.V.
Auke Vleerstraat 140 E | 7547 AN Enschede | KvK 08097527
T +31 (0) 53 48 00 694 | M +31 (0)6 26 358 951
jpr...@betterbe.com | www.betterbe.com
This e-mail is intended exclusively for the addressee(s), and may not
be passed on t
Hi,
I already created a ticket for this issue.
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17076
The complete logfile should be in this ticket.
Jan Hugo
Jan Hugo Prins
On 08/22/2016 10:36 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:42 AM, jan hugo prins wrote:
>> I have bee
nit zonegroup: (2) No such file or directory
> [root@blsceph01-1 ~]# radosgw-admin zone get > zone.conf.json
> unable to initialize zone: (2) No such file or directory
>
> This could have something to do with the other error radosgw-admin is
> giving me.
>
>
--
Met
ysconfig/ceph
I would suggest to put this in this config file by default because then
it is obvious for everyone that you can override the cluster name by
changing this default variable.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Best regards,
Jan Hugo Prins
Infra and Isilon storage consultant
Better.be B
03e80:
192.168.2.59 - - [18/Aug/2016:17:26:33 +0200] "PUT
/Photos/Options/x/180x102.jpg HTTP/1.1" 403 0 - -
Jan Hugo Prins
On 08/18/2016 01:32 PM, jan hugo prins wrote:
> did some more searching and according to some info I found RGW should
> support V4
t; Thanks
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:32 AM, jan hugo prins <mailto:jpr...@betterbe.com>> wrote:
>
> did some more searching and according to some info I found RGW should
> support V4 signatures.
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10333
> <htt
V4 signatures most of my requests work fine, but some requests
fail on a signature error.
Thanks,
Jan Hugo Prins
On 08/18/2016 12:46 PM, jan hugo prins wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> To connect to my S3 gateways using s3cmd I had to set the option
> signature_v2 in my s3cfg to true.
>
rvice(HttpServlet.java:646)
To me this looks a bit the same, though I'm not a Java developer.
Am I correct, and if so, can I tell the Java S3 client to use Version 2
signatures?
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Best regards,
Jan Hugo Prins
Infra and Isilon storage consultant
Better.be
, zone and I can start
creating placement groups.
If I'm missing something please let me know because I really want to
learn more about this.
Jan Hugo Prins
On 08/16/2016 02:48 PM, jan hugo prins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently testing a fresh Jewel install with RDS and I run
Hi,
I'm currently testing a fresh Jewel install with RDS and I run into some
issues.
The last couple of days everything was fine until I started playing
around with creating buckets in different storage pools and creating
different placement_targets. I Then I found out that the fresh install
of Je
up: (2) No such file or directory
[root@blsceph01-1 ~]# radosgw-admin zone get > zone.conf.json
unable to initialize zone: (2) No such file or directory
This could have something to do with the other error radosgw-admin is
giving me.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Best regards,
Jan Hugo Prins
In
21 matches
Mail list logo
