Fixed by https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/26779
Am 07.03.19 um 07:23 schrieb Jos Collin:
> I have originally created this bug when I saw this issue in
> debian/stretch. But now it looks like install-deps.sh is not installing
> 'colorize' package in Fedora too. I'm reopening this bug.
>
> On 07/0
no
> available space to move data, but you have plenty of space.
>
> Why do you have so little pgs? I would increase the amount of pgs, but
> before doing so lets see what others will say.
>
> Sinan
>
> Op 28 jul. 2018 om 11:50 heeft Sebastian Igerl het
> volgende geschrev
be surprised if it fixes itself after recovery.. but still would
be nice to know whats going on.
And the initial degraded still confuses me...
by the way.. i'm on mimic :-) latest version from today. 13.2.1
Sebastian
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 12:03 PM Sinan Polat wrote:
> Ceph has tr
16 active+recovering
11 active+recovery_wait+degraded
6 active+remapped+backfilling
1 active+remapped+backfill_toofull
Maybe someone can give me some pointers on what i'm missing to understand
whats happenin
If anyone else faces this problem in the future: I fixed it now by
running "apt install --reinstall ceph-osd". Don't know why the normal
apt upgrade broke it.
On 18.02.2018 22:35, Sebastian Koch - ilexius GmbH wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I ran "apt upgrade" on Ubuntu 1
asure-code/libec_jerasure.so: undefined symbol:
_ZN4ceph6buffer3ptrC1ERKS1_
Any advice how to get the node running again? Thank you very much!!!
Best regards,
Sebastian
--
Dipl.-Wirt.-Inf. Sebastian Koch
Geschäftsführer
ilexius GmbH
Unter den Eichen 5
Ha
t;
>>> Op 23 oktober 2016 om 10:04 schreef Sebastian Köhler :
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> is it possible to reduce the replica count of a pool that already
>>> contains data? If it is possible how much load will a change in the
>>>
Hello,
is it possible to reduce the replica count of a pool that already
contains data? If it is possible how much load will a change in the
replica size cause? I am guessing it will do a rebalance.
Thanks
Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
suddenly not publishing packages for a system although it was still
supported on paper so we rather use something more "mainstream".
Regards
Sebastian
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jun 5, 2016, at 5:48 PM, Sebastian Köhler
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
and then ceph to 0.94.7 followed by 10.2.1. Or should we first
upgrade Ceph and then Ubuntu? Or maybe doing it all at once?
Regards
Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http
er Hammer versions were provided so we assumed future releases
of Hammer would be provided for Debian 6.
Sebastian
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Hello,
it seems that there are no Debian Squeeze packages in the repository for the
current Hammer version. Is this an oversight or is there another reason those
are not provided?
Sebastian
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http
)
# lsb_release -r
Release:6.0.10
Cheers,
Sebastian
[1]
Feb 17 22:52:25 six kernel: [2401866.069932] kworker/6:1: page
allocation failure: order:1, mode:0x204020
Feb 17 22:52:25 six kernel: [2401866.069939] CPU: 6 PID: 4474 Comm:
kworker/6:1 Tainted: GW 3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64
Hi,
thanks for the nginx config. We did try it and it works like a charm. No more
stalling downloads. I wonder why apache does this though.
Sebastian
On 04.12.2013, at 10:53, Yann ROBIN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our conf :
> server {
>listen 80;
>
snippets.
Sebastian
On 30.11.2013, at 20:46, Andrew Woodward wrote:
> Are you using the inktank patched FastCGI sever? http://gitbuilder.ceph.com
>
> Alternately try another script sever like ngnix as already suggested.
>
> On Nov 29, 2013 12:23 PM, "German Anders" wrote:
t; (buggy library that was using select() instead of poll()).
There are not that many requests on the Storage, maybe 10-20 req/min. The
cluster serves as a source for a CDN, so once the resource is fetched it should
not be fetched again soon. I checked for the open files, and there are only
abou
; 2006KB/s rd,
0op/s
We already tried restarting the whole stack once but that did not help (at
least not for long). So no luck there.
Is 0.72 good for production yet? Might that fix it ;)?
Sebastian
On 29.11.2013, at 16:46, Artem Silenkov wrote:
> Good day!
> We ve noticed such things re
bout 500kb at that point though. Restarting radosgw fixes it for 1 download
only, the next one is broken again. But as i said this does not happen for all
files.
Sebastian
On 27.11.2013, at 21:53, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Sebastian wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
working properly. Most of them just work fine. A restart of radosgw fixes
the issue. The other ceph logs are also clean.
Any idea why this happens?
Sebastian
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
tion in my ceph.conf
and why the mon needs write permissions.
Best
Sebastian
Am 09.11.2013 um 11:50 schrieb Sebastian Deutsch
:
> When I do: ceph daemon osd.0 config show | grep socket
>
> "admin_socket": "\/var\/run\/ceph\/ceph-osd.0.asok",
&g
When I do: ceph daemon osd.0 config show | grep socket
"admin_socket": "\/var\/run\/ceph\/ceph-osd.0.asok",
"ms_inject_socket_failures": "0",
"rgw_socket_path": "",
"rgw_ops_log_socket_path": "",
why is the r
or authentication so I've added it.
I have the feeling that the whole gateway section is ignored / not interpreted
in the right way.
Best
Sebastian
Am 09.11.2013 um 06:16 schrieb Yehuda Sadeh :
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Sebastian Deutsch
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
&
radosgw.gateway
key: [...]
caps: [mon] allow rw
caps: [osx] allow rex
Any ideas how to fix or further debug this problem?
Best
Sebastian Deutsch
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo
23 matches
Mail list logo
