d7f4c6d0
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Radoslaw Zarzynski
> wrote:
>>
>> Bingo! From the 10.2.5-admin:
>>
>> GET
>>
>> Thu, 27 Apr 2017 07:49:59 GMT
>> /
>>
>> And also:
>>
>> 2017-04-27 09:49:59.117447
like it was introduced in 10.2.6
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Ben Morrice
>
> __
> Ben Morrice | e: ben.morr...@epfl.ch | t: +41-21-693-9670
> EPFL / BBP
> Biotech Campus
> Chemin des Mines 9
> 1202 Geneva
> Switzerland
>
> On 27/04/17 04:45, Radoslaw Zarzynski w
backed by keystone).
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Ben Morrice
>
> __
> Ben Morrice | e: ben.morr...@epfl.ch | t: +41-21-693-9670
> EPFL BBP
> Biotech Campus
> Chemin des Mines 9
> 1202 Geneva
> Switzerlan
Hello Ben,
Could you provide full RadosGW's log for the failed request?
I mean the lines starting from header listing, through the start
marker ("== starting new request...") till the end marker?
At the moment we can't see any details related to the signature
calculation.
Regards,
Radek
On
sgw.target
>
>
> two methods i find some different issues,
> in Method1, the radosgw item of the ceph.conf in /etc/ceph/ like "rgw
> keystone url" will convert rgw_keystone_url ,
Spaces and underscores in configurables' names are treated
in the same way. No difference.
Regards,
Radoslaw Zarzynski
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
p me to slove
> anyway, thx your support greate
You don't need to add anything. RadosGW will create
RGWUserInfo if necessary on the first, successfully
authenticated request [4]. The RADOS object will be
named after the tenant ID in Keystone.
Best regards,
Radoslaw Zarzynski
[1] https://github.c
Hello,
We definitely need more info.
Does only HEAD-on-account fail or other requests
are affected as well?
Can we get more verbose RadosGW's log? In such
situation debug_rgw=20 might be necessary.
Regards,
Radoslaw Zarzynski
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Orit Wasserman wrote:
> A
