r if one actually
should take some sort of action.
Thanks for answering!
Best Regards,
Patrik Martinsson,
Sweden
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
364688, "job": 6777, "event": "table_file_deletion",
"file_number": 17625}
2019-04-07 04:13:57.436121 7fba248c4700 4 rocksdb:
[/builddir/build/BUILD/ceph-12.2.8/src/rocksdb/db/db_impl_write.cc:684] reusing
log 17656 from recycle list
2019-04-07 04:13:57.
Hi Christian,
First of all, thanks for all the great answers and sorry for the late
reply.
On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 10:47 +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > I'm not a "storage-guy" so please excuse me if I'm missing /
> > overlooking something obvious.
> >
> > My question is in the
more
reliable ways of measuring it ?
Is there a way to calculate this "theoretically" (ie with with 6 nodes
and 36 SSD's we should get these numbers) and then compare it to the
reality. Again, not a storage guy and haven't really done this before
so please excuse me for my lay
ce *always* was the best solution
- if you use mainly spinners, have the journals on ssd's
- if you mainly use ssd's, have journals on nvme's
But that's not always the case I guess, and thanks for pointing that
out.
Best regards,
Patrik Martinsson
Sweden
On fre, 2016-1
t ?
Best regards,
Patrik Martinsson
Sweden
> On Oct 13, 2016 10:23 AM, "Patrik Martinsson"
> wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > We are in the process of buying hardware for our first ceph-
> > cluster. We
> > will start with some testing and
tlenecks or flaws that we are missing or could this may very
well work as good start (and the ability to grow with adding more
servers) ?"
When it comes to workload-wise-issues, I think we'll just have to see
and grow as we learn.
We'll be grateful for any input, thoughts, idea
