not be able to replicate
data in my future production cluster.
One more thing, I figured out that "degraded" means "undersized and
contains data".
Thanks
Maciej Puzio
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Maciej Puzio wrote
OSDs online, as
before), and three active+clean data pool PGs now became
active+clean+remapped, while the rest of PGs seems to have kept their
previous status.
Thanks
Maciej Puzio
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> active+clean does not make a lot of sense if every PG rea
own in the event of OSDs failures?
Thank you very much
Maciej Puzio
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
k you very much
Maciej Puzio
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Paul Emmerich wrote:
> The docs seem wrong here. min_size is available for erasure coded pools and
> works like you'd expect it to work.
> Still, it's not a good idea to reduce it to the number of data chunks.
about erasure-coded
pools, and not about replicated pools.
Thank you
Maciej Puzio
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
