On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Lionel Bouton <
lionel-subscript...@bouton.name> wrote:
> Le 23/11/2015 21:01, Jose Tavares a écrit :
>
>
>
>>
>> > My new question regarding Ceph is if it isolates this bad sectors where
>> it found bad data when scrubbin
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Lionel Bouton <
lionel-subscript...@bouton.name> wrote:
> Le 23/11/2015 19:58, Jose Tavares a écrit :
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Lionel Bouton <
> lionel-subscript...@bouton.name> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Lionel Bouton <
lionel-subscript...@bouton.name> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 23/11/2015 18:37, Jose Tavares a écrit :
> > Yes, but with SW-RAID, when we have a block that was read and does not
> match its checksum, the device falls out of the ar
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Jan Schermer wrote:
> So I assume we _are_ talking about bit-rot?
>
> > On 23 Nov 2015, at 18:37, Jose Tavares wrote:
> >
> > Yes, but with SW-RAID, when we have a block that was read and does not
> > match its checksum, the devi
e that. SW-RAID has its mdadm monitor that alerts
when things go bad. Should I have to be looking for ceph logs all the time
to see when things go bad?
Thanks.
Jose Tavares
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Robert LeBlanc
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
OSD per node and I have a 2 disk raid-1
setup. Is it a good option or it would be better if I had 2 OSDs, one in
each disk? If I had one OSD per disk, I would have to increase the number
os replicas to guarantee enough replicas if one node goes down.
Thanks a lot.
Jose Tavares
.
As suggested by Joao Eduardo, removing auth I could bring part of ceph up.
After that I troubleshooted this key problem, solved it, and know my whole
cluster is recovered and running fine ...
Thanks a lot.
Jose Tavares
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Jose Tavares wrote:
> Now I tried to in
(probing).data_health(1)
update_stats avail 19% total 220 GB, used 178 GB, avail 43178 MB
What does that mean?
Attached are the logs.
Thanks a lot.
Jose Tavares
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Jose Tavares wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Joao Eduardo Luis wrote:
&
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Joao Eduardo Luis wrote:
> On 11/17/2015 03:56 AM, Jose Tavares wrote:
> > The problem is that I think I don't have any good monitor anymore.
> > How do I know if the map I am trying is ok?
> >
> > I also saw in the logs that the p
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> On 11/17/2015 04:56 AM, Jose Tavares wrote:
> > The problem is that I think I don't have any good monitor anymore.
> > How do I know if the map I am trying is ok?
> >
>
> How do you mean there is no g
s going on and some monmaps that I capture
that were from minutes before the cluster become inaccessible ..
Should I try inject this monmaps in my primary mon to see if it can recover
the cluster?
Is it possible to see if this monmaps match my content?
Thanks a lot.
Jose Tavares
On Mon, Nov 16,
d I do? Do you recommend any specific procedure?
Thanks a lot.
Jose Tavares
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
