Looking further, i guess what i tried to tell was a simplified version of
sharded threadpools, released in giant. Is it possible for that to be
backported to firefly?
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Erdem Agaoglu
wrote:
> Thank you folks for bringing that up. I had some questions about shard
umb at all for how big is safe to let a
> >> RGW bucket get?
> >>
> >> Also, is this theoretically resolved by the new bucket-sharding
> >> feature in the latest dev release?
> >>
> >> -Ben
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:0
upgrade now and hope for the best :)
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Erdem Agaoglu
> wrote:
> > Hi all, especially devs,
> >
> > We have recently pinpointed one of the causes of slow requests in our
> > cl
io settings in
Firefly and such. While we are planning to upgrade in a few weeks but i
don't think those options will help us in any way. Am i correct?
Are there any other improvements that we are not aware?
Regards,
--
erdem agaoglu
___
ceph-user
gt; >
> > ___
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
--
erdem agaoglu
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
equest doesn't have
Authorization header) but we have a 400 and cannot figure out why.
Thanks in advance.
--
erdem agaoglu
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
ments, disks are 100% busy). SSD-based
> cluster which should not die under lack of IOPS, but prices for such
> thing still closer to the TrueEnterpriseStorage(tm) than any solution
> I can afford.
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph
e you settings for recovery max active and backfill? Just curious.
>
> Dave Spano
>
>
> ------
> *From: *"Erdem Agaoglu"
> *To: *"Dave Spano"
> *Cc: *"Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG" ,
> "ceph-users"
>
;m blaiming the CPUs in the OSDs for it, but I've also
> seen it on faster systems.
>
> I've 3,6Ghz xeons with just 4 osds per host.
>
> Stefan
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
--
erdem agaoglu
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
We ended up directly importing our original files to another bucket. Now
we're cleaning the files in the broken bucket.
Thanks for all the help.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Erdem Agaoglu wrote:
> There seems to be an open issue at s3cmd
> https://github.com/s3tools/s3cmd/issu
IRECTIVE=REPLACE).
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Erdem Agaoglu
> wrote:
> > This is the log grepped with the relevant threadid. It shows 400 in the
> last
> > lines but nothing seems odd besides that.
> > http://pastebin.com/xWCYmnXV
> >
> > Thanks for
ing radosgw-admin
> bucket stats on that bucket. You can grep that prefix in 'rados ls -p
> .rgw.buckets'.
>
> Do you have any rgw log showing why you get the Invalid Request response?
> Can you also add 'debug ms = 1' for the log?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
| grep | sed' ?
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
> Can you try copying one of these objects to itself? Would that work and/or
> change the index entry? Another option would be to try copying all the
> objects to a different bucket.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 8,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
> We'll need to have more info about the current state. Was just the
> omap header destroyed, or does it still exist? What does the header
> contain now? Are you able to actually access objects in that bucket,
> but just fail
Hi again,
I managed to change the file with some other bucket's index.
--check-objects --fix worked but my hopes have failed as it didn't actually
read through the files or fixed anything. Any suggestions?
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Erdem Agaoglu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Af
to
read through objects and fix the necessary parts. But i'm not sure how to
set the new-header. It seems there is a setomapheader counterpart for
getomapheader but it only accepts values from commandline so i don't know
how to push a rgw-readable binary with it.
Is this somewhat possible?
nk.com | http://www.ceph.com]
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Erdem Agaoglu
> wrote:
> > In addition, i was able to extract some logs from the last time
> > active/peering problem happened.
> > http://pastebin.com/BakFREFP
> > It ends with me restarting it.
> >
In addition, i was able to extract some logs from the last time
active/peering problem happened.
http://pastebin.com/BakFREFP
It ends with me restarting it.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Erdem Agaoglu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are currently in process of enlarging our bobtail cluste
d i look to get
any ideas about what's happening when it occurs?
Thanks in advance
--
erdem agaoglu
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/**listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.**com<http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com>
>>>
>>>
>
> __**_
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/**listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.**com<http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com>
>
--
erdem agaoglu
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
20 matches
Mail list logo
