Re: [ceph-users] PG Stuck active+undersized+degraded+inconsistent

2016-04-01 Thread Calvin Morrow
ceph4 -6 0 host soi-ceph5 > > I find it strange that 1023 PGs are undersized when only one OSD failed. > > Bob > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Calvin Morrow > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:24 PM Christian Balzer wrote: >> >>&

Re: [ceph-users] PG Stuck active+undersized+degraded+inconsistent

2016-03-31 Thread Calvin Morrow
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:24 PM Christian Balzer wrote: > On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:50:07 +0000 Calvin Morrow wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:27 AM Christian Balzer wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 18:10:33

Re: [ceph-users] PG Stuck active+undersized+degraded+inconsistent

2016-03-30 Thread Calvin Morrow
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:27 AM Christian Balzer wrote: > > Hello, > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 18:10:33 + Calvin Morrow wrote: > > > Ceph cluster with 60 OSDs, Giant 0.87.2. One of the OSDs failed due to a > > hardware error, however after normal recovery it seem

[ceph-users] PG Stuck active+undersized+degraded+inconsistent

2016-03-29 Thread Calvin Morrow
Ceph cluster with 60 OSDs, Giant 0.87.2. One of the OSDs failed due to a hardware error, however after normal recovery it seems stuck with one active+undersized+degraded+inconsistent pg. I haven't been able to get repair to happen using "ceph pg repair 12.28a"; I can see the activity logged in t