On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:57:34AM +0100, GBS Servers wrote:
> How to check ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> pon., 2 gru 2019 o 10:38 Alwin Antreich napisał(a):
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 08:17:49AM +0100, GBS Servers wrote:
> >
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 08:17:49AM +0100, GBS Servers wrote:
> Hi, im have problem with create new osd:
>
> stdin: ceph --cluster ceph --name client.bootstrap-osd --keyring
> /var/lib/ceph/bootstrap-osd/ceph.keyring -i - osd new
> b9e52bda-7f05-44e0-a69b-1d47755343cf
> Dec 2 08:09:03 ser
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 02:17:20PM +0200, Menno Zonneveld wrote:
> Update on the subject, warning, lengthy post but reproducible results and
> workaround to get performance back to expected level.
>
> One of the servers had a broken disk controller causing some performance
> issues on this one h
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Marc Roos wrote:
>
> It is idle, testing still, running a backup's at night on it.
> How do you fill up the cluster so you can test between empty and full?
> Do you have a "ceph df" from empty and full?
>
> I have done another test disabling new scrubs
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 03:52:21PM +0200, Menno Zonneveld wrote:
> ah yes, 3x replicated with minimal 2.
>
>
> my ceph.conf is pretty bare, just in case it might be relevant
>
> [global]
>auth client required = cephx
>auth cluster required = cephx
>auth service requi
Hello Leonardo,
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 11:09:31PM -0300, Leonardo Vaz wrote:
> Hey Cephers,
>
> The Ceph Community Newsletter of June 2018 has been published:
>
> https://ceph.com/newsletter/ceph-community-june-2018/
>
Thanks for the newsletter.
Sadly I didn't find any mentioning of the "Ce
Hello Marcus,
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 10:24:13AM +0100, Marcus Priesch wrote:
> Hello Alwin, Dear All,
>
> yesterday we finished cluster migration to proxmox and i had the same
> problem again:
>
> A couple of osd's down and out and a stuck request on a completely
> different osd which blocked the
Hello Marcus,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 07:09:35PM +0100, Marcus Priesch wrote:
> Dear Ceph Users,
>
> first of all, big thanks to all the devs and people who made all this
> possible, ceph is amazing !!!
>
> ok, so let me get to the point where i need your help:
>
> i have a cluster of 6 hosts, mixe
Hello Karun,
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 04:16:51AM +0530, Karun Josy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently, I deleted all the disks from an erasure pool 'ecpool'.
> The pool is empty. However the space usage shows around 400GB.
> What might be wrong?
>
>
> $ rbd ls -l ecpool
> $ $ ceph df
>
> GLOBAL:
> SIZ
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 05:38:46PM +0100, Caspar Smit wrote:
> 2017-11-09 17:02 GMT+01:00 Alwin Antreich :
>
> > Hi Rudi,
> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 04:09:04PM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Can someone please tell me what t
extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
> >> Warning: The kernel is still using the old partition table.
> >> The new table will be used at the next reboot or after you
> >> run partprobe(8) or kpartx(8)
> >> The operation has completed successfully.
> >&g
Hi Rudi,
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 04:09:04PM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone please tell me what the correct procedure is to upgrade a CEPH
> journal?
>
> I'm running ceph: 12.2.1 on Proxmox 5.1, which runs on Debian 9.1
>
> For a journal I have a 400GB Intel SSD drive and it seems C
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 12:09:03PM +0100, Alwin Antreich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am confused by the %USED calculation in the output 'ceph df' in luminous.
> In the example below the pools use 2.92% "%USED" but with my calculation,
> taken from the source code it gi
Hi Nitin,
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 12:03:15AM +, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> Dear Cephers,
>
> As seen below, I notice that 12.7% of raw storage is consumed with zero pools
> in the system. These are bluestore OSDs.
> Is this expected or an anomaly?
DB + WAL are consuming space already, if you ad
Hi,
I am confused by the %USED calculation in the output 'ceph df' in luminous. In
the example below the pools use 2.92% "%USED" but with my calculation, taken
from the source code it gives me a 8.28%. On a hammer cluster my calculation
gives the same result as in the 'ceph df' output.
Am I t
/usr/bin/ceph-mon -f --cluster ceph --id pve-hs-3
> --setuser ceph --setgroup ceph
>
>
> At 17:28 I have this in syslog / journal of pve-hs-2
>
> Oct 23 17:38:47 pve-hs-2 kernel: [255282.309979] libceph: mon1
> 10.10.10.252:6789 session lost, hunting for new mon
>
>
Hi Marco,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 04:10:34PM +0200, Marco Baldini - H.S. Amiata wrote:
> Thanks for reply
>
> My ceph.conf:
>
>[global]
> auth client required = none
> auth cluster required = none
> auth service required = none
> bluestore_bl
Hi George,
interesting result for your benchmark. May you please supply some more numbers?
As we didn't get that good of a result
on our tests.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Alwin
On 07/06/2016 02:03 PM, George Shuklin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I've been testing Intel 3500 as journal store for few HDD-based OSD
Hi Andrei,
are you using Jumbo Frames? My experience, I had a driver issues where
one NIC wouldn't accept the MTU set for the interface and the cluster
ran into a very similar behavior as you are describing. After I have set
the MTU for all NICs and servers to the working value of my troubling
NIC
and sources, I am definitely going to test these settings.
>
> Christian
>
Thanks for your replies.
--
with best regards,
Alwin Antreich
IT Analyst
antre...@cognitec.com
Cognitec Systems GmbH
Grossenhainer Strasse 101
01127, Dresden
Germany
Geschäftsführer: Alfredo Herrera
Amtsge
Hi All,
first I wanted to say hello, as I am new to the list.
Secondly, we want to use ceph for VM disks and cephfs for our source
code, image data, login directories, etc.
I would like to know, if striping would improve performance if we would
set something like the following and move away from
21 matches
Mail list logo
