On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Brad Hubbard wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 3:33 AM, w...@42on.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Op 24 dec. 2016 om 17:20 heeft L. Bader het volgende
>>> geschreven:
>>>
>>> Do you have any references on this?
>>>
>>> I searched for something like this quite a lot and did
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 3:33 AM, w...@42on.com wrote:
>
>
>> Op 24 dec. 2016 om 17:20 heeft L. Bader het volgende
>> geschreven:
>>
>> Do you have any references on this?
>>
>> I searched for something like this quite a lot and did not find anything...
>>
>
> No, saw it somewhere on the ML I thi
> Op 24 dec. 2016 om 17:20 heeft L. Bader het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> Do you have any references on this?
>
> I searched for something like this quite a lot and did not find anything...
>
No, saw it somewhere on the ML I think, but I am not sure.
I just know it is in development or on
On 16-12-23 22:14, Kent Borg wrote:
Hello, a newbie here!
Doing some playing with Python and librados, and it is mostly easy to
use, but I am confused about atomic operations. The documentation
isn't clear to me, and Google isn't giving me obvious answers either...
I would like to do some lo
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 01:32:31PM +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> > The designated metadata servers are LXC VMs, so the question is whether
> > I should give them 8 or 16 MB RAM. I also wonder whether the underlying
> > data store (hardware RAID 1, 7200 rpm SATA) would profit from using
> > S
On 12/24/2016 08:55 AM, Misa wrote:
I'm using a different scheme (might be suboptimal in your case).
I store object version id in object attributes. Every update increases
version number. So the update first reads object version from rados
and then creates transaction like this
```python
wop
> Op 24 dec. 2016 om 14:47 heeft L. Bader het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem with our (dead) Ceph-Cluster: The configuration seems to be
> gone (deleted / overwritten) and all monitors are gone aswell. However, we do
> not have (up-to-date) backups for all VMs (used
I'm using a different scheme (might be suboptimal in your case).
I store object version id in object attributes. Every update increases
version number. So the update first reads object version from rados and
then creates transaction like this
```python
wop = ctx.write_op_create()
wop.assert_e
Hello,
I have a problem with our (dead) Ceph-Cluster: The configuration seems
to be gone (deleted / overwritten) and all monitors are gone aswell.
However, we do not have (up-to-date) backups for all VMs (used with
Proxmox) and we would like to recover them from "raw" OSDs only (we have
all O
> Op 23 december 2016 om 21:14 schreef Kent Borg :
>
>
> Hello, a newbie here!
>
> Doing some playing with Python and librados, and it is mostly easy to
> use, but I am confused about atomic operations. The documentation isn't
> clear to me, and Google isn't giving me obvious answers either..
> Op 23 december 2016 om 16:05 schreef Wido den Hollander :
>
>
>
> > Op 22 december 2016 om 19:00 schreef Orit Wasserman :
> >
> >
> > HI Maruis,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Marius Vaitiekunas
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Marius Vaitiekunas
> > > wrote:
> Op 23 december 2016 om 14:34 schreef Eugen Leitl :
>
>
>
> Hi Wido,
>
> thanks for your comments.
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 02:00:44PM +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
> > > My original layout was using 2x single Xeon nodes with 24 GB RAM each
> > > under Proxmox VE for the test applic
12 matches
Mail list logo
