pool_requires_alignment can get pool's stripe_width, and you need
write multiple of that size in each append.
stripe_width can be configured with
osd_pool_erasure_code_stripe_width, but the actual size will be
adjusted by ec plugin
2016-10-17 18:34 GMT+08:00 James Norman :
> Hi Gregory,
>
> Many t
Hello:
Thank you very much for your detail answer. I have used iozone to test
randwrite, it reported not support in , but osd not crash.
发件人: huang jun [mailto:hjwsm1...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2016年10月18日 13:44
收件人: Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises
抄送: liuxuan 11625 (RD); ceph-users@lists.ceph
you can look into this:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10334
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/compare/master...athanatos:wip-ec-cache
the community have do a lot works related to ec for rbd and fs interface.
2016-10-18 13:06 GMT+08:00 Erick Perez - Quadrian Enterprises <
epe...@quadrianweb.com>:
>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:23 PM, huang jun wrote:
> ec only support writefull and append operations, but not partial write,
> your can try it by doing random writes, see if the osd crash or not.
>
> 2016-10-18 10:10 GMT+08:00 Liuxuan :
> > Hello:
> >
> >
> >
> > I have create cephfs which data
Hello,
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:19:53 +0200 Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2016-10-17T15:31:31, Maged Mokhtar wrote:
>
> > This is our first beta version, we do not support cache tiering. We
> > definitely intend to support it.
>
> Cache tiering in Ceph works for this use case. I assume you mea
ec only support writefull and append operations, but not partial write,
your can try it by doing random writes, see if the osd crash or not.
2016-10-18 10:10 GMT+08:00 Liuxuan :
> Hello:
>
>
>
> I have create cephfs which data pool type is EC and metadata is replica,
> The cluster reported error
Hello:
I have create cephfs which data pool type is EC and metadata is replica, The
cluster reported errors from MDSMonitor::_check_pool function.
But when I ignore to check the pool type, the cephfs can write and read datas.
Does anyone know why cephfs do not support EC pool?
__
Hello,
As I had this written mostly already and since it covers some points Nick
raised in more detail, here we go.
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:30:48 +0800 William Josefsson wrote:
> Thx Christian for helping troubleshooting the latency issues. I have
> attached my fio job template below.
>
There's
On 2016-10-17T15:31:31, Maged Mokhtar wrote:
> This is our first beta version, we do not support cache tiering. We
> definitely intend to support it.
Cache tiering in Ceph works for this use case. I assume you mean in
your UI?
Though we all are waiting for Luminous to do away with the need for
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 4:58 AM, Manuel Lausch wrote:
> Hi Gregory,
>
> each datacenter has its own IP subnet which is routed. We created
> simultaneously iptables rules on each host wich drops all packages in and
> outgoing to the other datacenter. After this our application wrote to DC A,
> ther
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:34 AM, James Norman wrote:
> Hi Gregory,
>
> Many thanks for your reply. I couldn't spot any resources that describe/show
> how you can successfully write / append to an EC pool with the librados API
> on those links. Do you know of any such examples or resources? Or is i
On 10/17/2016 02:40 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> For the (non target_mode approach), everything that is needed for basic
Oops. Meant to write for the non target_mod_rbd approach.
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/
If it is just a couple kernel changes you should post them, so SUSE can
merge them in target_core_rbd and we can port them to upstream. You will
not have to carry them and SUSE and I will not have to re-debug the
problems :)
For the (non target_mode approach), everything that is needed for basic
I
Some config hints here, if you convert your config, you have to unset the
admin_token and change the api version to 3, then you can specify the
keystone user, password, domain, tenant, etc.
You can see what we do for puppet-ceph [1] if you need a refrence
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/puppet-ce
Thanks Wei/Pavan for the response, it seems I need to debug osds to find out
what is the cause of slowing down.
Will update community if I find anything conclusive.
Regards
Somnath
-Original Message-
From: Wei Jin [mailto:wjin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:13 AM
To: Som
Thank you David very much and thank you for the correction.
--
From: "David Disseldorp"
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 5:24 PM
To: "Maged Mokhtar"
Cc: ; "Oliver Dzombic" ;
"Mike Christie"
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] new Open Source Ceph based iSC
Hi Lars,
Yes I was aware of David Disseldorp & Mike Christie efforts to upstream the
patches from a while back ago. I understand there will be a move away from
the SUSE target_mod_rbd to support a more generic device handling but do not
know what the current status of this work is. We have made
Hi Maged,
Thanks for the announcement - good luck with the project!
One comment...
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:37:29 +0200, Maged Mokhtar wrote:
> if you are refering to clustering reservations through VAAI. We are using
> upstream code from SUSE Enterprise Storage which adds clustered support for
Thanks
Yes … working again … *phew* :)
> On 17 Oct 2016, at 14:01, Dan Milon wrote:
>
> debian/jessie/jewel is fine now.
—
Jon Morby
FidoNet - the internet made simple!
tel: 0345 004 3050 / fax: 0345 004 3051
twitter: @fido | skype://jmorby | web: https://www.fido.net
signature.asc
Descr
On 2016-10-17T13:37:29, Maged Mokhtar wrote:
Hi Maged,
glad to see our patches caught your attention. You're aware that they
are being upstreamed by David Disseldorp and Mike Christie, right? You
don't have to uplift patches from our backported SLES kernel ;-)
Also, curious why you based this o
Hi Maged,
sounds very valid.
And as soon as we can, we will try it out.
Thank you, and good luck with your project !
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards
Oliver Dzombic
IP-Interactive
mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de
Anschrift:
IP Interactive UG ( haftungsbeschraenkt )
Zum Sonnenberg 1
Hi Oliver,
This is our first beta version, we do not support cache tiering. We
definitely intend to support it.
Cheers /maged
--
From: "Oliver Dzombic"
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:05 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] new Open Source Ceph ba
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Jon Morby (Fido) wrote:
> full output at https://pastebin.com/tH65tNQy
>
>
> cephadmin@cephadmin:~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ceph.list
> deb https://download.ceph.com/debian-jewel/ xenial main
>
>
> oh and fyi
> [osd04][WARNIN] W:
> https://download.ceph.com/de
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Stillwell, Bryan J
wrote:
> On 10/14/16, 2:29 PM, "Alfredo Deza" wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Stillwell, Bryan J
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/13/16, 2:32 PM, "Alfredo Deza" wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Stillwell, Bryan J
wrote:
debian/jessie/jewel is fine now.
On 10/17/2016 02:36 PM, Jon Morby (FidoNet) wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
> The repos do indeed seem to be messed up …. it’s been like it for at
> least 4 days now (since everything went offline)
>
> I raised it via IRC over the weekend and also on this list on Saturday …
>
>
Hi Maged,
thank you for your clearification ! That makes it intresting.
I have red that your base is ceph 0.94, in this version using cache tier
is not recommanded, if i remember correctly.
Does your codemodification also take care of this issue ?
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards
O
Hi Gregory,
each datacenter has its own IP subnet which is routed. We created
simultaneously iptables rules on each host wich drops all packages in
and outgoing to the other datacenter. After this our application wrote
to DC A, there are 3 of 5 Monitor Nodes.
Now we modified in B the monmap (r
Hi Oliver,
if you are refering to clustering reservations through VAAI. We are using
upstream code from SUSE Enterprise Storage which adds clustered support for
VAAI (compare and write, write same) in the kernel as well as in ceph
(implemented as atomic osd operations). We have tested VMware
Hi Dan
The repos do indeed seem to be messed up …. it’s been like it for at least 4
days now (since everything went offline)
I raised it via IRC over the weekend and also on this list on Saturday …
All the mirrors seem to be affected too (GiGo I guess) :(
Jon
> On 17 Oct 2016, at 11:33, Dan M
Hi Gregory,
Many thanks for your reply. I couldn't spot any resources that describe/show
how you can successfully write / append to an EC pool with the librados API on
those links. Do you know of any such examples or resources? Or is it just
simply not possible?
Best regards,
James Norman
>
Hello,
I'm trying to install ceph jewel from the debian repository, but it
seems to be in a very weird state.
ceph, ceph-mon, ceph-osd exist in the pool, but the Packages file does
not have any of them.
https://download.ceph.com/debian-jewel/dists/jessie/main/binary-amd64/Packages
The other days
> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
> William Josefsson
> Sent: 17 October 2016 10:39
> To: n...@fisk.me.uk
> Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RBD with SSD journals and SAS OSDs
>
> hi nick, I earlier did
hi nick, I earlier did cpupower frequency-set --cpu-governor
performance on all my hosts, which bumped all CPUs up to almost max
speed or more.
It didn't really help much, and I still experience 5-10ms latency in
my fio benchmarks in VMs with this job description.
Is there anything else I can do
> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
> William Josefsson
> Sent: 17 October 2016 09:31
> To: Christian Balzer
> Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] RBD with SSD journals and SAS OSDs
>
> Thx Christian for he
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Somnath Roy wrote:
> Hi Sage et. al,
>
> I know this issue is reported number of times in community and attributed to
> either network issue or unresponsive OSDs.
> Recently, we are seeing this issue when our all SSD cluster (Jewel based) is
> stressed with larg
full output at https://pastebin.com/tH65tNQy
cephadmin@cephadmin:~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ceph.list
deb https://download.ceph.com/debian-jewel/ xenial main
oh and fyi
[osd04][WARNIN] W:
https://download.ceph.com/debian-jewel/dists/xenial/InRelease: Signature by key
08B73419AC32B4E966C1A
Thx Christian for helping troubleshooting the latency issues. I have
attached my fio job template below.
I thought to eliminate the factor that the VM is the bottleneck, I've
created a 128GB 32 cCPU flavor. Here's the latest fio benchmark.
http://pastebin.ca/raw/3729693 I'm trying to benchmark t
Hello,
I have the same problem. I am using Debian 8.6 and ceph-deploy 1.5.36
Logs from ceph-deploy:
[*hv01*][*INFO* ] Running command: env DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical apt-get --assume-yes -q
--no-install-recommends install -o Dpkg::Options::=--force-confnew
ceph-os
Regarding the mon_osd_min_down_reports I was looking at it recently, this could
provide some insight
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/0269a0c17723fd3e22738f7495fe017225b924a4
Thanks!
On 10/17/16, 1:36 PM, "ceph-users on behalf of Somnath Roy"
wrote:
Thanks Piotr, Wido for quick respon
Hello,
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:42:09 +0200 (CEST) i...@witeq.com wrote:
> Hi Wido,
>
> thanks for the explanation, generally speaking what is the best practice when
> a couple of OSDs are reaching near-full capacity?
>
This has (of course) been discussed here many times.
Google is your frien
Thanks Piotr, Wido for quick response.
@Wido , yes, I thought of trying with those values but I am seeing in the log
messages at least 7 osds are reporting failure , so, didn't try. BTW, I found
default mon_osd_min_down_reporters is 2 , not 1 and latest master is not having
mon_osd_min_down_rep
Hi Wido,
thanks for the explanation, generally speaking what is the best practice when a
couple of OSDs are reaching near-full capacity?
I could set their weight do something like 0.9 but this seems only a temporary
solution.
Of course i can add more OSDs, but this change radically my prospe
> Op 17 oktober 2016 om 9:16 schreef Somnath Roy :
>
>
> Hi Sage et. al,
>
> I know this issue is reported number of times in community and attributed to
> either network issue or unresponsive OSDs.
> Recently, we are seeing this issue when our all SSD cluster (Jewel based) is
> stressed wit
> Op 16 oktober 2016 om 11:57 schreef "Jon Morby (FidoNet)" :
>
>
> Morning
>
> It’s been a few days now since the outage however we’re still unable to
> install new nodes, it seems the repo’s are broken … and have been for at
> least 2 days now (so not just a brief momentary issue caused by
Hi Sage et. al,
I know this issue is reported number of times in community and attributed to
either network issue or unresponsive OSDs.
Recently, we are seeing this issue when our all SSD cluster (Jewel based) is
stressed with large block size and very high QD. Lowering QD it is working just
f
45 matches
Mail list logo
