Re: [ceph-users] how to re-add a deleted osd device as a osd with data

2016-03-28 Thread Christian Balzer
Hello, On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:00:44 +0800 lin zhou wrote: > Hi,Christian. > When I re-add these OSD(0,3,9,12,15),the high latency occur again.the > default reweight of these OSD is 0.0 > That makes no sense, at a crush weight (not reweight) of 0 they should not get used at all. When you deleted

Re: [ceph-users] how to re-add a deleted osd device as a osd with data

2016-03-28 Thread Mohd Zainal Abidin Rabani
What is version you use? - Regards, Mohd Zainal Abidin Rabani Technical Support -- Original Message -- From: "lin zhou" To: "Christian Balzer" Cc: "Ceph-User" Sent: 29/03/2016 14:00:44 Subject: Re: [ceph-users] how to re-add a deleted osd device as a osd with data Hi,Chri

Re: [ceph-users] how to re-add a deleted osd device as a osd with data

2016-03-28 Thread lin zhou
Hi,Christian. When I re-add these OSD(0,3,9,12,15),the high latency occur again.the default reweight of these OSD is 0.0 root@node-65:~# ceph osd tree # idweight type name up/down reweight -1 103.7 root default -2 8.19host node-65 18 2.73

Re: [ceph-users] how to re-add a deleted osd device as a osd with data

2016-03-28 Thread lin zhou
Thanks.I try this method just like ceph document say. But I just test osd.6 in this way,and the leveldb of osd.6 is broken.so it can not start. When I try this for other osd,it works. 2016-03-29 8:22 GMT+08:00 Christian Balzer : > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:36:14 +0800 lin zhou wrote: > >> > Hello, >

[ceph-users] librbd on opensolaris/illumos

2016-03-28 Thread Sumit Gaur
Hello , Can anybody let me know if ceph team is working on porting of librbd on openSolaris like it did for librados ? Thanks sumit ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[ceph-users] HELP Ceph Errors won't allow vm to start

2016-03-28 Thread Dan Moses
Any suggestions to fix this issue? We are using Ceph with proxmox and vms won't start due to these Ceph Errors. This in turn prevents any vm from starting up. This is a live server, please advise. Mar 28 22:01:22 pm3 systemd[1]: Unit ceph.service entered failed state. Mar 28 22:09:00 pm3 system

Re: [ceph-users] how to re-add a deleted osd device as a osd with data

2016-03-28 Thread Christian Balzer
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:36:14 +0800 lin zhou wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:41:57 +0800 lin zhou wrote: > > > > > Hi,guys. > > > some days ago,one osd have a large latency seeing in ceph osd > > > perf.and this device make this node a high cpu await. > > The thing to do at that po

Re: [ceph-users] kernel cephfs - slow requests

2016-03-28 Thread Dzianis Kahanovich
Christian Balzer пишет: >> New problem (unsure, but probably not observed in Hammer, but sure in >> Infernalis): copying large (tens g) files into kernel cephfs (from >> outside of cluster, iron - non-VM, preempt kernel) - make slow requests >> on some of OSDs (repeated range) - mostly 3 Gbps chan

Re: [ceph-users] v10.1.0 Jewel release candidate available

2016-03-28 Thread Simon Leinen
Sage Weil writes: > The first release candidate for Jewel is now available! Cool! [...] > Packages for aarch64 will also be posted shortly! According to the announcement, Ubuntu Xenial should now be supported instead of Precise; but I don't see Xenial packages on download.ceph.com. Will those a

[ceph-users] v10.1.0 Jewel release candidate available

2016-03-28 Thread Sage Weil
Hi everyone, The first release candidate for Jewel is now available! Jewel is the next major release of Ceph, and will be the foundation for the next long-term stable release. There have been many major changes since the Infernalis (9.2.x) and Hammer (0.94.x) releases, and the upgrade process

Re: [ceph-users] how to re-add a deleted osd device as a osd with data

2016-03-28 Thread lin zhou
> Hello, > > On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:41:57 +0800 lin zhou wrote: > > > Hi,guys. > > some days ago,one osd have a large latency seeing in ceph osd perf.and > > this device make this node a high cpu await. > The thing to do at that point would have been look at things with atop or > iostat to verify t