Christian,
> Ceph: no tuning or significant/relevant config changes, OSD FS is Ext4,
> Ceph journal is inline (journal file).
Quick question. Is there any reason you selected Ext4?
Cheers,
Shinobu
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Balzer"
To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Sent: Thursda
> Muwhahahahaha, that was a much needed laugh after the adrenaline rush of
> phasing in a cache tier in the wee hours of last night. ^o^
${subject} is my bad -;
A pretty much lol. Sorry for my typo!
> 1. It quite amuses me that a Redhat employee (or so one deduces from your
> mail address) goes t
As per the subject - when using tell to benchmark a OSD does it go
through the OSD's journal or just the osd disk itself?
--
Lindsay Mathieson
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Hello,
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:07:38 -0800 Heath Albritton wrote:
> I've done a bit of testing with the Intel units: S3600, S3700, S3710, and
> P3700. I've also tested the Samsung 850 Pro, 845DC Pro, and SM863.
>
> All of my testing was "worst case IOPS" as described here:
>
> http://www.anand
Hi All,
How the progress of NFS on RGW? Does it released on Infernalis? The
contents of NFS on RGW is
http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/wiki/RGW_-_NFS
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-us
Did another test with same scenario but I was wandering about deep-scrub.
So after corrupted CEPH PG I tried to strace
First strace with no error detection
# ceph pg deep-scrub 0.1e
7f0492f94700 0 log_channel(cluster) log [INF] : 0.1e deep-scrub starts
7f049078f700 0 log_channel(cluster) log
>>enables the librbd objectmap feature by default,
Are you sure it's enable it "by default" ?
The original tracker
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13558
seem to be fixing a bug, where we can't enable objectmap on a rbd volume.
But it's not enabling it by default.
- Mail original -
De:
I assume you author meant deduplication? :-)
Cheers,
Josef
> On 28 Feb 2016, at 02:08, Lindsay Mathieson
> wrote:
>
> On 28/02/2016 10:23 AM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote:
>> Does the Ceph have ${subject}?
>
> Well ceph 0.67 was codename "Dumpling", and we are well past that, so yes I
> guess ceph has
