Hello Stefan...
Those 64 PGs refer to the default rbd pool which is created. Can you
please give us the output of
# ceph osd pool ls detail
# ceph pg dump_stuck
The degraded / stale status means that the PGs can not be replicated
according to your policies.
My guess is that you sim
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Stefan Eriksson wrote:
I have a completely new cluster for testing and its three servers which all
are monitors and hosts for OSD, they each have one disk.
The issue is ceph status shows: 64 stale+undersized+degraded+peered
health:
health HEALTH_WARN
clock
Hi,
src/tools/rados.c has some striper rados snippet.
and I have this little project using striper rados.
see:https://github.com/thesues/striprados
wish could help you
Dongmao Zhang
在 2015年09月17日 01:05, Paul Mansfield 写道:
> Hello,
> I'm using the C interface librados striper and am looking
> -Original Message-
> From: Gregory Farnum [mailto:gfar...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:32 PM
> To: Deneau, Tom
> Cc: ceph-users
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] rados bench seq throttling
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Deneau, Tom wrote:
> > Running 9.0.3 rados be
Hi guys,
afaik rbd always splits the image into chunks of size 2^order (2^22 = 4MB by
default). What's the benefit of specifying
the feature flag "STRIPINGV2"? I couldn't find any documenation about it except
http://ceph.com/docs/master/man/8/rbd/#striping which doesn't explain the
benefits (or
That worked. Thank you!
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:31 PM Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Ramon Marco Navarro
> wrote:
> > Good day everyone!
> >
> > I'm having a problem using aws-java-sdk to connect to Ceph using
> radosgw. I
> > am reading a " NOTICE: failed to parse dat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
My understanding of growing file systems is the same as yours, it can
only grow at the end not the beginning. In addition to that, having
partition 2 before partition 1 just cries to me to have it fixed, but
that is just aesthetic.
Because the weigh
Hello,
I'm using the C interface librados striper and am looking for examples
on how to use it.
Please can someone point me to any useful code snippets? All I've found
so far is the source code :-(
Thanks very much
Paul
___
ceph-users mailing list
cep
I have a completely new cluster for testing and its three servers which
all are monitors and hosts for OSD, they each have one disk.
The issue is ceph status shows: 64 stale+undersized+degraded+peered
health:
health HEALTH_WARN
clock skew detected on mon.ceph01-osd03
Christian,
Thanks for the feedback.
I guess I'm wondering about step 4 "clobber partition, leaving data in
tact and grow partition and the file system as needed".
My understanding of xfs_growfs is that the free space must be at the end
of the existing file system. In this case the existing part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I was out of the office for a few days. We have some more hosts to
add. I'll send some logs for examination.
-
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Guan
Hi all,
I'm having trouble adding OSDs to a storage node; I've got about
28 OSDs running, but adding more fails.
Typical log excerpt:
2015-09-16 13:55:58.083797 7f3e7b821800 1 journal _open
/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-28/journal fd 20: 21474836480 bytes, block
size 4096 bytes, directio = 1, aio = 1
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:06 PM, darko wrote:
> Sorry is this was asked already. Is there an "optimal" file system one
> should use for ceph?
See
http://ceph.com/docs/master/rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations/#filesystems.
Thanks,
Ilya
__
Hello,
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:21:26 -0500 John-Paul Robinson wrote:
> The move journal, partition resize, grow file system approach would
> work nicely if the spare capacity were at the end of the disk.
>
That shouldn't matter, you can "safely" loose your journal in controlled
circumstances.
T
So I just realized I had described the partition error incorrectly in my
initial post. The journal was placed at the 800GB mark leaving the 2TB data
partition at the end of the disk. (See my follow-up to Lionel for details.)
I'm working to correct that so I have a single large partition the siz
The move journal, partition resize, grow file system approach would
work nicely if the spare capacity were at the end of the disk.
Unfortunately, the gdisk (0.8.1) end of disk location bug caused the
journal placement to be at the 800GB mark, leaving the largest remaining
partition at the end of
This may help:
http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2015-September/004295.html
Cheers,
Simon
From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of Vickie
ch
Sent: 16 September 2015 10:58
To: ceph-users
Subject: [ceph-users] Deploy osd with btrfs not success.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Vickie ch wrote:
> Hi cephers,
> Have anyone ever created osd with btrfs in Hammer 0.94.3 ? I can create
> btrfs partition successfully. But once use "ceph-deploy" then always get
> error like below. Another question there is no parameter " -f " with mkfs.
>
Hi cephers,
Have anyone ever created osd with btrfs in Hammer 0.94.3 ? I can create
btrfs partition successfully. But once use "ceph-deploy" then always get
error like below. Another question there is no parameter " -f " with mkfs.
Any suggestion is appreciated.
--
Здравствуйте!
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:16:47PM +, fangzhe.chang wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to run Ceph on a few machines, each of which has multiple disks. The
> disks are heterogeneous: some are rotational disks of larger capacities while
> others are smaller solid state disks. What are t
20 matches
Mail list logo
