Hello,
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 04:16:01 +0200 Francois Lafont wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Christian Balzer wrote:
>
> > For starters, make that 5 MONs.
> > It won't really help you with your problem of keeping a quorum when
> > loosing a DC, but being able to loose more than 1 monitor will come in
> > handy
I have a suspicion about what caused this. Can you restart one of the problem
osds with
debug osd = 20
debug filestore = 20
debug ms = 1
and attach the resulting log from startup to crash along with the osdmap binary
(ceph osd getmap -o ).
-Sam
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Laird"
Hi,
Christian Balzer wrote:
> For starters, make that 5 MONs.
> It won't really help you with your problem of keeping a quorum when
> loosing a DC, but being able to loose more than 1 monitor will come in
> handy.
> Note that MONs don't really need to be dedicated nodes, if you know what
> you'r
Nope. Straight from 0.87 to 0.94.1. FWIW, at someone's suggestion, I just
upgraded the kernel on one of the boxes from 3.14 to 3.18; no improvement.
Rebooting didn't help, either. Still failing with the same error in the
logs.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 2:06 PM Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> Did you up
Did you upgrade from 0.92? If you did, did you flush the logs before
upgrading?
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Scott Laird wrote:
> I'm upgrading from Giant to Hammer (0.94.1), and I'm seeing a ton of OSDs
> die (and stay dead) with this error in the logs:
>
> 2015-04-19 11:53:36.796847 7f61fa
I'm upgrading from Giant to Hammer (0.94.1), and I'm seeing a ton of OSDs
die (and stay dead) with this error in the logs:
2015-04-19 11:53:36.796847 7f61fa900900 -1 osd/OSD.h: In function
'OSDMapRef OSDService::get_map(epoch_t)' thread 7f61fa900900 time
2015-04-19 11:53:36.794951
osd/OSD.h: 716:
>>From the version number it looks buggy. I'm really interested what fixed the
>>issue for you.
I'll test with debian client with my new hardware to compare.
Currently, client difference vs previous test is:
- centos7.1 vs debian wheezy
- librbd hammer vs giant
- CPU E5-2687W @3.1GHZ vs CPU E5-
Hello,
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 06:22:44 +0200 Francois Lafont wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are thinking about a ceph infrastructure and I have questions.
> Here is the conceived (but not yet implemented) infrastructure:
> (please, be careful to read the schema with a monospace font ;))
>
>
>
