[ceph-users] Don't allow user to create buckets but can read in radosgw

Hi, There are any way to set permission that don't allow users to create buckets but they can read these buckets? and how to add prefix to a bucket when users create one, ex: when user 'aa' create a bucket called 'testing', bucket name will be 'aatesting'? Best regards, Thanh Tran ___

Re: [ceph-users] [OFF TOPIC] Deep Intellect - Inside the mind of the octopus

Everyone involved with Ceph must be curious about Cephalopods.. Very interesting article.. http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/6474/ Amit Vijairania --*-- ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.co

[ceph-users] [OFF TOPIC] Deep Intellect - Inside the mind of the octopus

Everyone involved with Ceph must be curious about Cephalopods.. Very interesting article.. http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/6474/ - Amit Vijairania ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/lis

Re: [ceph-users] Replace journals disk

Hi Gandalf and all, FYI, I checked sgdisk's man page and it seems that the correct command to restore should be: sgdisk --load-backup=/tmp/journal_table /dev/sdg Will try this next weekend and update again. Thank you. On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Indra Pramana wrote: > Hi Gandalf, >

[ceph-users] fixing degraded PGs

Hi, I built a new cluster followed the tutorial "http://ceph.com/docs/master/start/";. Then I got bunch of PGs degraded. ceph-osd1:~# ceph -s cluster 00f2b37f-ccfd-4569-b27d-8ddcce62573d health HEALTH_WARN 192 pgs degraded; 192 pgs stuck unclean monmap e1: 1 mons at {ceph-mon1=192.1

Re: [ceph-users] NFS over CEPH - best practice

On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 09:24:30PM +0100, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: > Sorry if these questions will sound stupid, but I was not able to find an > answer by googling. > As the Astralians say: no worries, mate. It's fine. > 1. Does iSCSI protocol support having multiple target servers to serve

Re: [ceph-users] NFS over CEPH - best practice

Sorry if these questions will sound stupid, but I was not able to find an answer by googling. 1. Does iSCSI protocol support having multiple target servers to serve the same disk/block device? In case of ceph, the same rbd disk image. I was hoping to have multiple servers to mount the same r

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-noarch firefly repodata

No reason, this is obviously something that needs some fixing. Created an issue to track this problem and fix it tracker.ceph.com/issues/8330 On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Simon Ironside wrote: > Hi there, > > Is there any reason not to use the latest packages from: > ceph.com/rpm-firefly/rh

[ceph-users] ceph-noarch firefly repodata

Hi there, Is there any reason not to use the latest packages from: ceph.com/rpm-firefly/rhel6/noarch/ ? I.e. when installing via yum, ceph-deploy-1.4.0 is installed but 1.5.0, 1.5.1 and 1.5.2 are present in the directory above. Yum also complains about radosgw-agent-1.2.0-0.noarch.rpm not bei

Re: [ceph-users] Info firefly qemu rbd

Sorry guys for the delay. BTW: Yes it seems a Libvirt bug but the seem environment with Emperor and it works. I didn’t fix the problem and I rolled-back to Emperor. All my system are managed by puppet and I can consider that as pre-production system. Regards, Federico Il giorno 08/mag/2014, a

Re: [ceph-users] v0.80 Firefly released

> > # ceph tell mon.* injectargs '--mon_osd_allow_primary_affinity true' > > Ignore the "mon.a: injectargs: failed to parse arguments: true" > warnings, this appears to be a bug [0]. > > It will work this way: ceph tell mon.* injectargs -- --mon_osd_allow_primary_affinity=true _