On Mar 29, 2013, at 9:32 PM, Waed Bataineh wrote:
> Dan,
>
> well exactly if i used the mapping command line i have confusion about some
> issues if i may :
> _ exactly what it meant by obj in rados -p put , is this
> obj consider like the first part of the file and pointing to the othe
Dan,
well exactly if i used the mapping command line i have confusion about some
issues if i may :
_ exactly what it meant by obj in * rados -p put * , is
this obj consider like the first part of the file and pointing to the
other object?
_how i can get the file back ?
_Finally, if i have two O
so "rados -p put " is one way to create an object.
There are also C/C++/Python librados bindings for writing programs to do so.
On 03/28/2013 05:30 AM, Waed Bataineh wrote:
Object Store.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Sebastien Han
mailto:sebastien@enovance.com>> wrote:
Hi,
On 03/19/2013 07:06 PM, Josh Durgin wrote:
On 03/18/2013 07:53 AM, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
On 03/13/2013 06:38 PM, Josh Durgin wrote:
Anyone seeing this problem, could you try the wip-rbd-cache-aio branch?
Hi,
just compiled and tested it out, unfortunately there's no big change
On 03/29/2013 08:56 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
I'd assume more people are going to encounter this, so I thought an e-mail to
the ceph-users list would be best.
On a cluster I have one PG which is active+clean+inconsistent.
I tried this:
$ ceph pg r
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd assume more people are going to encounter this, so I thought an e-mail to
> the ceph-users list would be best.
>
> On a cluster I have one PG which is active+clean+inconsistent.
>
> I tried this:
> $ ceph pg repair 2.6a5
>
> In my log
Hi,
I'd assume more people are going to encounter this, so I thought an
e-mail to the ceph-users list would be best.
On a cluster I have one PG which is active+clean+inconsistent.
I tried this:
$ ceph pg repair 2.6a5
In my logs it showed:
2013-03-29 20:27:07.177416 osd.4 [ERR] repair 2.6a5
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Marco Aroldi wrote:
> Still trying with no success:
>
> Sage and Ronnie:
> I've tried the ping_pong tool, even with "locking=no" in my smb.conf
> (no differences)
>
> # ping_pong /mnt/ceph/samba-cluster/test 3
> I have about 180 locks/second
That is very slow.
>
Still trying with no success:
Sage and Ronnie:
I've tried the ping_pong tool, even with "locking=no" in my smb.conf
(no differences)
# ping_pong /mnt/ceph/samba-cluster/test 3
I have about 180 locks/second
If I start the same command from the other node, the tools stops
completely. 0 locks/second
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:41:55AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> > On 03/27/2013 10:41 AM, Marco Aroldi wrote:
> > > Hi list,
> > > I'm trying to create a active/active Samba cluster on top of Cephfs
> > > I would ask if Ceph fully supports CTDB at this time
10 matches
Mail list logo
