[ceph-users] Re: [Ceph-announce] v18.2.4 Reef released

Rook users are seeing OSDs fail on arm64 with v18.2.4. I would think it also affects non-rook users. Tracker opened: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/67213 Thanks, Travis On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 3:13 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > We're happy to announce the 4th release in the Reef series. > > An ea

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.1 QE Validation status

Yuri, we need to add this issue as a blocker for 18.2.1. We discovered this issue after the release of 17.2.7, and don't want to hit the same blocker in 18.2.1 where some types of OSDs are failing to be created in new clusters, or failing to start in upgraded clusters. https://tracker.ceph.com/issu

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.1 QE Validation status

I'd like to see these changes for much improved dashboard integration with Rook. The changes are to the rook mgr orchestrator module, and supporting test changes. Thus, this should be very low risk to the ceph release. I don't know the details of the tautology suites, but I would think suites invol

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.1 QE Validation status

9bf3adb1bc973595e91 > [2] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54514/files > > > -- > Guillaume Abrioux > Software Engineer > > -- > *From:* Yuri Weinstein > *Sent:* 15 November 2023 20:23 > *To:* Nizamudeen A ; Guillaume Abrioux < > gabri...@

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.1 QE Validation status

> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 12:13 PM Travis Nielsen > wrote: > > > > Thanks Guiilaume and Redo for tracking down this issue. After talking > more with Guillaume I now realized that not all the tests were using the > expected latest-reef-devel label so Rook tests were incorre

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.1 QE Validation status

PR [2] for reef has been merged. >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > >> > >> > [2] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54514/files >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Guillaume Abrioux >&g

[ceph-users] Re: Rook-Ceph OSD Deployment Error

Sounds like you're hitting a known issue with v17.2.7. https://github.com/rook/rook/issues/13136 The fix will be in v18.2.1 if it's an option to upgrade to Reef. If not, you'll need to use v17.2.6 until the fix comes out for quincy in v17.2.8. Travis On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 4:06 PM P Wagner-Becc

[ceph-users] Re: CLT Meeting minutes 2023-12-06

On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 8:26 AM Laura Flores wrote: > Closing the loop (blocked waiting for Neha's input): how are we using > Gibba on a day-to-day basis? Is it only used for checking reef point > releases? > >- To be discussed again next week, as Neha had a conflict > > [Nizam] http://old.cep

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.2 (hot-fix) QE validation status

Looks great to me, Redo has tested this thoroughly. Thanks! Travis On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 8:48 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64721#note-1 > Release Notes - TBD > LRC upgrade - TBD > > Seeking approvals/reviews for: >

[ceph-users] Re: reef v18.1.0 QE Validation status

Rook daily CI is passing against the image quay.io/ceph/daemon-base:latest-main-devel, which means the Reef release is looking good from Rook's perspective: With the Reef release we need to have the tags soon: quay.io/ceph/daemon-base:latest-reef-devel quay.io/ceph/ceph:v18 Guillaume, will th

[ceph-users] Re: Rook on bare-metal?

Here are the answers to some of the questions. Happy to follow up with more discussion in the Rook Slack , Discussions , or Issues . Thanks! Travis On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 4:43 AM Anthony D'Atri

[ceph-users] Re: ref v18.2.0 QE Validation status

Approved for Rook. Rook tests are passing against the latest Reef. Thanks, Travis On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 9:46 AM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Details of this release are summarized here: > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/62231#note-1 > > Seeking approvals/reviews for: > > smoke - Laura, Radek > r

[ceph-users] Re: 16.2.14 pacific QE validation status

Approved for rook. For future approvals, Blaine or I could approve, as Seb is on another project now. Thanks, Travis On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 7:06 AM Venky Shankar wrote: > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 7:17 AM Patrick Donnelly > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:41 AM Yuri Weinstein > wrot

[ceph-users] Re: After upgrading from 17.2.6 to 18.2.0, OSDs are very frequently restarting due to livenessprobe failures

If there is nothing obvious in the OSD logs such as failing to start, and if the OSDs appear to be running until the liveness probe restarts them, you could disable or change the timeouts on the liveness probe. See https://rook.io/docs/rook/latest/CRDs/Cluster/ceph-cluster-crd/#health-settings . B

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.0 QE Validation status

Rook is ready for Quincy, thanks! Travis On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 1:48 PM Yuri Weinstein wrote: > I am assuming approvals from Neha and Venky. > Still not sure if Sébastien Han approved rook. > > We are waiting for the last PR to be mergedhttps:// > github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/45885 > > Then all (

[ceph-users] Re: quincy v17.2.1 QE Validation status

Ok, let's declare Rook signed off. First time asking for Rook, I'll try to pay more attention going forward... :) Rook has some daily tests in the Rook repo running against the following tags. quay.io/ceph/daemon-base:latest-

[ceph-users] Re: MDS and stretched clusters

Yes, with Rook this is possible by adding zone anti-affinity for the MDS pods. Travis On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 3:35 PM Gregory Farnum wrote: > No, unfortunately this needs to be done at a higher level and is not > included in Ceph right now. Rook may be able to do this, but I don't think > cepha

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.1 RC QE validation status

When running the Rook CI against the latest squid devel image, we are seeing issues creating OSDs, investigating with Guillaume... https://github.com/rook/rook/issues/15282 Travis On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 7:57 AM Laura Flores wrote: > The Gibba cluster has been upgraded. > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.1 RC QE validation status

> The rook ci must be failing because a `ceph-bluestore-tool` backport [1] > is missing. > > This backport was merged ~6 hours ago. > > > > [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/60543 > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > Guillaume Abrioux > > So

[ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.1 RC QE validation status

Although, I am not clear the difference between the squid branch since we started seeing this issue last week, and the 19.2.1 branch, so Guillaume or RADOS team should confirm for sure. On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 1:38 PM Travis Nielsen wrote: > I confirmed that the Rook CI is now passing with

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.5 QE validation status

Oh sorry, forget my last email, thanks Laura for pointing out the obvious that this is for reef, not squid! On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:46 PM Travis Nielsen wrote: > Yuri, as of when did 18.2.5 include the latest squid branch? If [1] is > included in 18.2.5, then we really need [2] merged

[ceph-users] Re: reef 18.2.5 QE validation status

Yuri, as of when did 18.2.5 include the latest squid branch? If [1] is included in 18.2.5, then we really need [2] merged before release, as it would be blocking Rook. [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/62095 (merged to squid on March 19) [2] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/70667 Thanks! Travi