+1
On 3.3.2021 г. 11:37 ч., Marc wrote:
Secondly, are we expecting IBM to "kill off" Ceph as well?
Stop spreading rumors! really! one can take it further and say kill
product
x, y, z until none exist!
This natural / logical thinking, the only one to blame here is IBM/redhat. If
you have no
Hello,
Cluster is 3 nodes Debian 10. Started cephadm upgrade on healthy 15.2.10
cluster. Managers were upgraded fine then first monitor went down for
upgrade and never came back. Researching at the unit files container
fails to run because of an error:
root@host1:/var/lib/ceph/97d9f40e-9d33-
t on if we want
to run containers.
-Dave
--
Dave Hall
Binghamton University
kdh...@binghamton.edu <mailto:kdh...@binghamton.edu>
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:51 PM Radoslav Milanov
mailto:radoslav.mila...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
Cluster is 3 nodes Debian 10. Started ceph
Hello
Tried cephadm upgrade form 16.2.0 to 16.2.1
Managers were updated first then process halted on first monitor being
upgraded. The monitor fails to start:
root@host3:/var/lib/ceph/c8ee2878-9d54-11eb-bbca-1c34da4b9fb6/mon.host3#
/usr/bin/docker run --rm --ipc=host --net=host --entrypoint
If stream is so great why is RHEL different ?
On 30.6.2021 г. 03:49 ч., Teoman Onay wrote:
For similar reasons, CentOS 8 stream, as opposed to every other CentOS
released before, is very experimental. I would never go in production with
CentOS 8 stream.
Experimental?? Looks like you still
-stream releases.
Stream is one minor release ahead than RHEL which means it already
contains part of the fixes which will be released a few months later
in RHEL. It could be considered even more stable as it already
contains part of the fixes.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021, 15:15 Radoslav Milanov
There is a problem upgrading ceph-iscsi from 16.25 to 16.2.6
2021-09-21T12:43:58.767556-0400 mgr.nj3231.wagzhn [ERR] cephadm exited
with an error code: 1, stderr:Redeploy daemon iscsi.iscsi.nj3231.mqeari ...
Creating ceph-iscsi config...
Write file:
/var/lib/ceph/c6c8bc66-1716-11ec-b029-1c34da
Not everyone is subscribed to low traffic MLs. Something like should be
posted on all lists I think.
On 29.10.2021 г. 05:43 ч., Daniel Poelzleithner wrote:
On 29/10/2021 11:23, Tobias Fischer wrote:
I would propose to either create a separate Mailing list for these kind
of Information from t
Have you tries this with the native client under Linux ? It could be
just slow cephfs ?
On 1.11.2021 г. 06:40 ч., Mason-Williams, Gabryel (RFI,RAL,-) wrote:
Hello,
We have been trying to use Ceph-Dokan to mount cephfs on Windows. When
transferring any data below ~1GB the transfer speed is as
