Thanks for bringing this up.
We need to update Cheroot in Fedora and EPEL 8. I've opened
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cheroot/pull-request/3 to
get this into Fedora first.
I've published an el8 RPM at
https://fedorapeople.org/~ktdreyer/bz1868629/ for early testing. I can
bring up a "
;>> last night, and on our test cluster of 504 OSDs, being polled by the
>>> internal prometheus and our external instance, the mgrs stopped responding
>>> and dropped out of the cluster entirely. This is impacting not just
>>> metrics, but the mgr itself. I thi
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 12:03 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
> There are a few more small cleanups I need to land in order to
> reconcile the epel8 and master branches.
The maintainers merged the cleanups. Here's the next PR to sync the
remaining epel8 diff into master:
https://src.fedoraproje
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:11 AM Eugen Block wrote:
> I
> found a bug report [1] stating that the option '--ceph-version' will
> be removed.
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917552
Note that bugzilla ticket is about the downstream RH Ceph Storage
product, where we have a very d
I think it's a great idea to remove it.
- Ken
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:52 PM Adam C. Emerson wrote:
>
> Good day,
>
> Some time ago, the LevelDB maintainers turned -fno-rtti on in their
> build. As we don't use -fno-rtti, building LevelDBStore
> against newer LevelDB packages can fail.
>
> Thi
Hi folks,
In the Ceph Leadership Team meeting today we discussed dropping
support for older distros in our Reef release. CentOS 9 and Ubuntu
Jammy (22.04) have been out for a while. With recent changes in Ceph's
main branch, it will make it easier to minimally require CentOS 9 and
Ubuntu Jammy wit
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 11:35 AM Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> CentOS 8 Stream will continue to receive packages or have some barrires for R?
No, starting with Reef, we will no longer build nor ship RPMs for
CentOS 8 Stream (and debs for Ubuntu Focal) from download.ceph.com.
The only
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 11:24 PM Sagittarius-A Black Hole
wrote:
>
> No, I actually included the ceph fstype, just not in my example (the
> initial post), but the key is really mds_namespace for specifying the
> filesystem, this should be included in the documentation.
We removed mds_namespace fr
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 7:52 AM Dominique Ramaekers
wrote:
> Is it possible these pulls aren’t jet included in Quincy Stable?
>
> I can't find a notice in my syslog about the mount syntax I use being
> deprecated.
Those PRs are in Quincy. However, there are no syslog warnings about
deprecating t
How much more time do we need to get PR 50549 in if we delayed v17.2.6?
- Ken
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 2:44 PM Laura Flores wrote:
> We are all good on the Core end of things.
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/50549 is needed for downstream, but it
> should not block upstream.
>
> On Thu, Mar
I hope we don't backport such a big change to Quincy. That will have a
large impact on how we build in restricted environments with no
internet access.
We could get the missing packages into EPEL.
- Ken
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 7:32 AM Ernesto Puerta wrote:
>
> Hi Casey,
>
> The original idea wa
irst step, we'd need to
> build a full list of the missing packages. the tracker issue only
> complains about python3-asyncssh python3-pecan and python3-routes, but
> some of their dependencies may be missing too
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 3:06 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
> >
>
aid,
> > where feasible, I also prefer to keep the current approach for a minor
> > version.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Ernesto
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 9:06 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
> >>
> >> I hope we don't backport such a b
ph1/keyring
# Ensure permissions are correct:
chown -R ceph:ceph /var/lib/ceph/radosgw/
# Configure RGW as "done":
sudo -u ceph touch /var/lib/ceph/radosgw/ceph-rgw.ceph1/done
# Start the service:
systemctl enable --now ceph-radosgw@rgw.ceph1
# Create a RGW user:
radosgw-admin user create --ui
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 6:03 AM Wido den Hollander wrote:
> And to add to this: No, a newly created RBD image will never have 'left
> over' bits and bytes from a previous RBD image.
>
> I had to explain this multiple times to people which were used to old
> (i)SCSI setups where partitions could ha
Hi David,
Some parts of OpenStack upstream CI consume the download.ceph.com
binaries for nautilus on CentOS 7, and the developers are asking if we
can provide nautilus builds for CentOS 8 as well.
What are the steps to do that for future Nautilus releases?
- Ken
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 7:54 AM
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:25 AM David Galloway wrote:
> If there will be a 14.2.10 or 14.3.0 (I don't actually know), it will be
> built and signed for CentOS 8.
>
> Is this sufficient?
Yes, thanks!
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:03 AM Sasha Litvak
wrote:
>
> * I am bothered with a quality of the releases of a very complex system that
> can bring down a whole house and keep it down for a while. While I wish the
> QA would be perfect, I wonder if it would be practical to release new
> packages to
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 1:56 PM Sasha Litvak
wrote:
>
> I guess for me the more crucial questions should be answered:
>
> 1. How can a busted release be taken out of repos (some metadata
> update I hope)?
It's hard to define the word "busted" in a way that satisfies everyone.
For example, in
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 3:34 PM Mazzystr wrote:
> - nothing provides libleveldb.so.1()(64bit) needed by
> ceph-osd-2:15.2.0-0.el8.x86_64
Does the OSD still use leveldb at all?
- Ken
___
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe se
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 5:12 AM Marc wrote:
>
> Sorry for posting off topic, a bit to lazy to create yet another account
> somewhere. I still need to make this upgrade to different os. I have now
> some vms on centos9 stream. What annoys me a lot is that tcp wrapper
> support is not default added
21 matches
Mail list logo
